- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 10 Feb 2021
Clients that are continuously commissioning construction work might want to reduce procurement timescales, learning curves and other risks by using framework agreements. This allows the client to invite tenders from suppliers of goods and services to be carried out over a period of time on a call-off basis as and when required.
The framework contract documents should define the scope and possible locations for the works or services likely to be required during the defined time period. They should describe the contract conditions that will be used for pre-construction services (such as design), and/or the contract conditions that will be used to execute the works.
Depending on the size and complexity of the anticipated projects, the supplier might provide a pricing mechanism or risk adjustment mechanism for different types of contract that might be used, for example a minor works contract, a cost reimbursable contract, a design and build contract, and so on. A suitable option would then be selected by the client depending on the nature of the projects that emerged.
- The starting and completion dates of the agreement.
- Requirements and obligations regarding insurance, bonds and warranties.
- A description of the contract conditions to be used and assumptions regarding preliminaries.
- A description of how the project will be managed in its various stages and the basis of remuneration.
- A description of the tender selection procedure and assessment procedure to be employed by the client.
- A description of inflation, interest and retention percentages to be applied.
- A description of incentive mechanisms to be applied.
- A description of dispute resolution procedures.
- Rates for travel and subsistence expenses.
- A request for schedules of rates and time charges to be submitted and a breakdown of resources and overheads to be applied to design, or manufacture and installation (including any proposed subcontractor or sub-consultant details).
- Any other criteria required from tenderers in order that the client can properly assess their suitability.
Where there is more than one suitable supplier available, the client may introduce a secondary selection process to assess which supplier is likely to offer best value for a specific project. The advantage to the client of this process is that they are able instigate a selection procedure for individual projects without having to undertake a time-consuming pre-qualification process (which might be subject to OJEU procurement rules on public projects). This should also reduced tender costs.
The advantage to the supplier is that the likelihood of them being awarded a project when they are already on a framework contract should be higher than it would be under an open procurement process. Some suppliers however complain that having already been appointed on a framework agreement, they may then have to bid for individual projects anyway, and after a great deal of time and effort may not be awarded any projects.
Its recommendations include:
- Once established, frameworks must be used by customers.
- Frameworks should deliver a specified minimum value of work.
- The number of companies on a framework should be proportionate.
- Customers should refrain from using multiple frameworks for greater flexibility.
- Framework operators should only consider the use of mini competitions if there is a clear commercial reason for doing so.
- Pre Qualification Questionnaires (PQQs) for frameworks should adopt proposals being developed by the industry for a single industry standard approach.
CECA’s director of external affairs Marie-Claude Hemming said: “…while frameworks can be a useful tool to organise and deliver civil engineering projects, they do not always work effectively… We are therefore keen to start a discussion on how we can make frameworks work for everyone. Over the coming year we will be sharing this document with the wider infrastructure community and others, and we hope that our recommendations will become incorporated by our customers and wider government.”
Marie-Claude Hemming said: “While we recognise that frameworks provide the ability to engage a consistent supply chain across a series of similar projects, bringing the benefits of spreading best practice from job to job, we are now in a situation where a contractor tracking future work may see a multiplicity of different routes to market for any one scheme."
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Appointing consultants.
- Call-off contract.
- Collaborative practices.
- Construction contract.
- Crown Commercial Service CCS.
- Egan report.
- Government construction strategy.
- Independent review of construction frameworks.
- Latham report.
- OJEU procurement rules.
- Open-book accounting.
- Procurement route.
- Public procurement.
- Supply chain management.
Featured articles and news
ECA comments on findings of BEIS Green Jobs Task Force.
Why government can't support public transport forever.
Government introduces the Information Management Mandate.
Designing and building for the future.
Fabricating mystical connections between nature and architecture.
IHBC issues responses to ECO4 and PAS 2035.
The narrative power of video gaming technology.
Report examines the possibilities and limitations of localised actions.
This multilingual dictionary translates technical terms and concepts.
From simple, two room buildings to massive, elaborate structures.