Why hard copies of O&M manuals are obsolete
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The building owner's manual, or operation and maintenance manual (O&M manual), contains the information required for the operation, maintenance, decommissioning and demolition of a building.
So, how many hard copies do you need?
The answer is none. In 2017, there are much more effective methods of delivery for structured data and O&M requirements.
Multiple hard copies are often a contractual requirement but this does not mean they shouldn’t be challenged. Here’s a typical example of the standard A37 specification within the Employers Information Requirements [EIRs]:
However, generally, when a client is informed of the problems associated with paper copies and the direct cost saving available by reducing them, it is often possible to eliminate hard copies entirely.
[edit] The problem with hard copies
Once a hard copy is delivered, it is rarely looked at and provides limited benefit to the end user.
Common problems associated with hard copy O&Ms:
- They are costly to produce.
- They quick to become out of date.
- They have significant storage requirements.
- They are susceptible to loss and damage.
- It can be difficult to locate information
[edit] Benefits of paperless alternatives
Delivering project data through the cloud has numerous benefits for the end user over traditional paper methods:
- Cost savings
- They are simple to navigate.
- Data is secure and backed up.
- They can be accessed anywhere at anytime.
- The ability to integrate with client systems.
[edit] Why not invest in hosting instead?
The cost saving from eliminating hard copies can be invested in services that may be more beneficial to end users such a hosting agreement, which provides:
- 24/7 access to real project data.
- Updates for future fit-out and alterations.
- On-going training and support for end users.
[edit] Or an enhanced asset register & PPM schedule
Often, when a building manager takes occupation, the first thing they do is procure an expensive manual survey to identify what plant they have inherited. This is because key asset data is buried within hundreds of pages of paper O&M manuals.
By investing in an on-line asset register and planned preventative maintenance schedule (PPM), building mangers can avoid this cost and plan for occupation well in advance.
Benefits include;
- Early availability of asset data.
- Day zero PPM.
- Mobilise staff and procure maintenance contracts.
- Integrate with existing CAFM systems.
--Createmaster 16:57, 12 Jun 2017 (BST)
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building log book.
- Building owner's manual - O and M manual
- Building user's guide.
- Handover to client.
- Health and safety file.
- Maintenance.
- Operation and Maintenance Manuals - Cheap Options.
- Operation, maintenance and training (OMT).
- Practical completion.
- Preliminaries.
- Technical guide.
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Bridging the gap between clients and contractors
Concerns remain around contractor quality, capability, and delivery.
Construction Management, 10 June.
Heat pumps beat boilers in new home tests.
Building Safety Act implementation in Wales
CIAT to host industry panel on 26 June.
New and updated CLC building safety guidance.
New UK National Buildings Database.
Building Safety Wiki Interviews
Chief executive of the British Woodworking Federation.
Planning condition discharge in England and Wales
A brief explanation from a building compliance expert, with further links.
Overheating guidance and tools for building designers
Guidance for dealing with element of building fabric control that have increasing importance.
Shading for housing, a design guide
From the Good Homes Alliance and British Blind and Shutter Association.
UK Standard Skills Classification (SSC)
A shared framework for describing skills needs.
Social media ban consultation comes to close
CIOB urges UK Government to consider social media’s role in careers guidance in ban debate.


















