Why hard copies of O&M manuals are obsolete
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The building owner's manual, or operation and maintenance manual (O&M manual), contains the information required for the operation, maintenance, decommissioning and demolition of a building.
So, how many hard copies do you need?
The answer is none. In 2017, there are much more effective methods of delivery for structured data and O&M requirements.
Multiple hard copies are often a contractual requirement but this does not mean they shouldn’t be challenged. Here’s a typical example of the standard A37 specification within the Employers Information Requirements [EIRs]:
However, generally, when a client is informed of the problems associated with paper copies and the direct cost saving available by reducing them, it is often possible to eliminate hard copies entirely.
[edit] The problem with hard copies
Once a hard copy is delivered, it is rarely looked at and provides limited benefit to the end user.
Common problems associated with hard copy O&Ms:
- They are costly to produce.
- They quick to become out of date.
- They have significant storage requirements.
- They are susceptible to loss and damage.
- It can be difficult to locate information
[edit] Benefits of paperless alternatives
Delivering project data through the cloud has numerous benefits for the end user over traditional paper methods:
- Cost savings
- They are simple to navigate.
- Data is secure and backed up.
- They can be accessed anywhere at anytime.
- The ability to integrate with client systems.
[edit] Why not invest in hosting instead?
The cost saving from eliminating hard copies can be invested in services that may be more beneficial to end users such a hosting agreement, which provides:
- 24/7 access to real project data.
- Updates for future fit-out and alterations.
- On-going training and support for end users.
[edit] Or an enhanced asset register & PPM schedule
Often, when a building manager takes occupation, the first thing they do is procure an expensive manual survey to identify what plant they have inherited. This is because key asset data is buried within hundreds of pages of paper O&M manuals.
By investing in an on-line asset register and planned preventative maintenance schedule (PPM), building mangers can avoid this cost and plan for occupation well in advance.
Benefits include;
- Early availability of asset data.
- Day zero PPM.
- Mobilise staff and procure maintenance contracts.
- Integrate with existing CAFM systems.
--Createmaster 16:57, 12 Jun 2017 (BST)
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building log book.
- Building owner's manual - O and M manual
- Building user's guide.
- Handover to client.
- Health and safety file.
- Maintenance.
- Operation and Maintenance Manuals - Cheap Options.
- Operation, maintenance and training (OMT).
- Practical completion.
- Preliminaries.
- Technical guide.
Featured articles and news
Report on the construction sector in Ireland
TASC/CIOB study looks at post-pandemic struggles and trends.
Revised targets for Carbon Budget 6
The Government announces recalibrated goals.
ECA proposes strategies for the present and the future.
Paul Morrell to lead independent review of the construction products testing regime.
Standard will help employers foster wellbeing and manage psychosocial risks.
The United Nations has approved the IFSS common principles
Global fire standards for safety of people and property.
An introduction to the 5 core principles of lean.
Civil engineers and environmental methods of construction
Can the profession use its skills to save the world from climate change?
How faulty science resulted in sanitation reform.
Conserving the Hilda Besse Building
Improving facilities, accessibility and overall appearance.
BSRIA IAQ topic guide published
Free download of TG 12/2021 available.
Electrotechincal mentors wanted
TESP works with The Youth Group to form skill sharing network.
OpenBuilt supply chain technology in development
Big tech collaborates on platform for the built environment.
Concerns raised over Future Buildings Standard
Letter signed by 21 organisations sent to MHCLG.
Receive the Designing Buildings newsletter
Click the button to subscribe.