- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 13 Feb 2021
Visions for future cities
The visions of today’s urban designers and planners will be judged by future citizens. Andreas Brück and Angela Million of TU Berlin discuss a themed issue of ICE’s Urban Design and Planning journal on the topic.
The future is always in the making, and so are cities. Constant re-imagining and re-making by citizens and the continuous reconfiguration of the built environment make the urban spaces we inhabit a myriad of multiple re-imaginations and alternatives.
An important part of urban design and planning – though we may forget about it on a day-to-day basis – is future studies and strategic foresight. The active envisioning of futures for the built environment that will surround us tomorrow is a core topic of urban design and planning.
We proposed a themed issue of ICE’s Urban Design and Planning journal on visions future cities because we wanted to know: what visions of future cities exist today? What alternative scenarios or ideas are there and which should be investigated? What are theoretical underpinnings to be explored related to future cities? How does urban envisioning work? Are there new forms of projecting and crafting urban futures
 Importance of visions
First, we want to emphasise how important visions are in general, and how crucial their creation is – especially when it comes to cities and future urbanities – by asking: what are future visions of cities good for?
While there could be many ways to answer this question, in our opinion the future should be seen as a significant renewable resource for humanity. As such, ‘a future’ is an essential part of our daily lives, and even more, it is a necessity. Not thinking about the future, not making predictions, and simply waiting for it to arrive, is escapism.
In today's times of multiple crises and transformations – induced by challenging global trends and problematic developments on the local and global level, among other factors – we are confronted with profound change and ever faster acceleration.
 Engaging in foresight
Secondly, we would like to stress the importance of looking beyond immediate short-term realities and engaging in foresight and visioning by urban designers and planners through asking: why should engineers, planners and urban designer be visionary?
The answer is because they can. They (ideally) are trained to envision solutions and have the capacity to communicate their ideas to a broader audience that might get convinced of their virtue. Yet, getting too crazy about the future is often accompanied by fear of being (or becoming) ‘out of touch’ with reality, and of widening the gap between theory and practice, or between academia and the professional world.
In a profession that is heavily involved with unknowns, uncertainties and doubts, fears arise of not meeting the needs of today's planning, engineering and design practices. One could end up only proposing speculative, hypothetical answers to pressing questions.
 Future education
And, third, we would like to underline and reflect on the importance of visions for future cities in the education of future urban planners and designers, and briefly reflect on the implications for university programmes and the way urban design and planning is (or should) be taught.
The question is: how can universities and the study programmes of urban planning and design be places for future thinking? Looking back at more than six years of teaching at TU Berlin we can say that future city visioning is a major focus in our classes.
Students are encouraged to come up with new ways to think about the city beyond what we are providing, and to produce outcomes that may seem futuristic, yet are based on educated parameters and have the potential to develop into concrete designs or planning proposals.
 Citizens are the key
Challenges will continue to rise, old and new ones, and the future of cities is uncertain. Nonetheless, the conditions alone – be they natural, political, technological and so on – will not make our cities. Rather, it is the (re)actions of citizens (among them urban designers and planners) that will determine whether cities are able to cope, evolve, succeed or take a second try at success.
In the future, urbanites may look back at urbanisms of the twenty-first century (and their planners) and find our visions, worries, machinations and debates laughable, inaccurate, confused, or foolish. Yet they will have to live in the urban tomorrows we are creating.
What is left to us is to try hard to leave a legacy that inspires people to create anew for the renewable future, that helps in finding better ways of integrating the countless aspects of life in cities, and one that we can learn from and build on.
This article was originally published here on 30 August 2018 by ICE. It was written by Andreas Bruck and Angela Million.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles by ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- A brighter future for our towns and cities.
- Can we build cities that anticipate the future?
- Engineering Smart Cities.
- Four ways smart cities will make our lives better.
- Global smart cities market.
- Measuring the success of smart cities.
- Smart cities need to find some smarter answers.
- The innovations making our cities smarter and greener.
- The Living City: Rethinking our role in the Digital Age.
Featured articles and news
A new gallery for the University of Huddersfield.
What will it take to stop it ?
To celebrate world bee day 2022 !
Not forgetting part F and the new part overheating part O.
As energy prices jump up in cost.
With people in the UK from Ukraine.
Industry leader Steve Murray takes on role.
An abundant and versatile building material.
600,000 heat pump installations targeted per year by 2028.
Helping prevent those unwanted outcomes.
How has transport changed due to Covid-19 ?
Will you need it ? after June 15 and the new Part O ?
Create an account and write the first of many articles.
CIAT commentary after the first meeting.
Who is to blame?
Research recommends focussing on portfolio success rather than project success.
The revised standard for mapping underground utilities.