Thickening claims
![]() |
At its simplest, thickening is a contribution to a claimant’s increased overheads resulting from a client-culpable delay. Thickening is a legal term used in claims when claimants are legally entitled to claim extra costs – over and above the direct costs they may be already claiming – as a result of a delay which is outside their control.
For example, where an extension of time is granted to a contractor, they may also be entitled to claim for time-related costs for the delay period, in other words, in addition to the claim for direct costs, they may also be able to claim for ‘thickened’ overheads resulting from client/employer culpable delay or disruption.
In thickening claims, the claimant must, for example, prove that their head-office overheads had ‘thickened’, i.e. had increased, as a result of the defendant’s breach.
A celebrated case of thickening from October 2016 was that between contractor Flour, which had been engaged to construct an offshore wind farm, and steel fabricator ZPMC. Cracking had occurred in the welding of the steel monopoles and the transition pieces of the turbines for which the court held ZPMC to be in breach of contract. Damages of £15m and €7m were awarded to Fluor as part of direct costs caused by the breach and included costs of additional project management staff, consultants’ costs for the remedial works and costs for extra plant and equipment, as well as for providing extra storage space.
However, in addition, Fluor also claimed for ‘thickening’ costs amounting to 4% of the award – comprising overheads to reflect the increased head-office costs that were necessitated as a result of dealing with the breach of contract. Fluor argued that the thickening costs were just as much a result of the breach as were the direct costs.
The landmark case introduced the concept that certain overhead costs can be linked to a breach of duty just as if they were ordinary losses, i.e. direct losses that include items such as new materials, extra labour and consultant costs necessitated by the breach.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Adjudication.
- Adversarial behaviour in the UK construction industry.
- Alternative dispute resolution.
- Arbitration.
- Causes of construction disputes.
- Civil procedure rules.
- Conflict avoidance.
- Contract sum.
- Contractual right.
- Construction contract.
- Dispute resolution.
- Dispute resolution boards.
- Disruption claims in construction.
- Expert witness.
- Extension of time.
- Final account.
- Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act.
- How to prepare a claim for an extension of time.
- Litigation.
- Liquidated damages.
- Loss and expense.
- Mediation.
- Modifying clauses in standard forms of contract.
- Notice.
- Preliminaries.
- Scheme for Construction Contracts.
- Variation.
- What is a default?
Featured articles and news
Social distancing goes high tech
Tech tools to help manage people and space post-pandemic.
Eclectic Edwardian architecture
A style that ranges from mock Tudor to arts and crafts to the 'Wrenaissance'.
Free guide from Secured by Design.
Building Back Better: Circularity
BREEAM strategy for sustainability and the circular economy.
Free tool to improve the construction programming process.
Building services verification
Are buildings doing what they're supposed to be doing?
Cities with quick access to everything by foot or bike.
The pressures and pinch points of global destinations.
The green economic recovery beyond COVID-19
Making the case for a sustainable future.
Building Conservation Certification Scheme expands eligibility
Retrofit professionals now entitled to enter CIOB programme.
Unlimited Potential report looks at gender and racial bias
How, where, when and why stereotypes happen.
Optimising the best features of both energy performance tools.
The project information process
BSRIA guidance updated in BG 78/2021 publication.
ISO standard supports crime prevention through environmental design.