Performance in use of completed buildings
Generally, performance in use assessments do not begin until 6 to 12 months after occupation, as operations may not be properly established before then, and the development will not have operated in all seasons.
Performance in use assessments should then be part of a continuous, ongoing process.
An assessment of performance in use generally includes an evaluation of two aspects of a development:
- Business objectives.
 Business objectives
An evaluation of business objectives might include:
- The achievement of business case objectives.
- Whole-life costs and benefits against those forecast (including an assessment of capital costs vs running costs).
- Whether the project continues to comply with the current business strategy.
- Whether operations have improved as a result of the development.
- The resilience of the development and business to ongoing or likely change.
- Business and user satisfaction (including staff and user retention and motivation).
 Design evaluation
An evaluation of design might include:
- The effectiveness of space planning.
- Aesthetic quality.
- The standards of lighting, the acoustic environment, ventilation, temperature and humidity.
- Air-pollution and air quality.
- User comfort.
- Maintenance and occupancy costs.
- The balance between capital and running costs.
- An assessment of whether the development is being operated as designed (including assessment of user controlled systems).
- Environmental and energy consumption in use. NB Regular evaluation of energy consumption is mandatory for certain types of buildings under the Energy Performance of Buildings (Certificates and Inspections) (England and Wales) Regulations). See the article on energy certificates for more information.
The assessment should compare findings to the original targets set out in business case (the original targets may need to be updated to reflect changes to the project brief during the design process as well as wider changes such as inflation). It should also compare findings to other projects and industry standards and compare the outcome of the project with the position had the project not taken place.
A report should be prepared that identifies issues, recommends remedies, and makes recommendations for improvements in performance both for the development being assessed and for future projects.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building performance evaluation.
- Building performance metrics.
- Building use studies (BUS).
- Closing the gap between design and as-built performance.
- Defects liability period.
- End of contract report.
- Energy performance certificates.
- Government construction strategy.
- Handover to client.
- Lessons learned report.
- Migration strategy.
- OGC Gateway Review 5: Operations review & benefits realisation (or benefits evaluation)
- Performance gap.
- Post occupancy evaluation (repeats some of the text in this article).
- Post project review.
- Soft landings.
Featured articles and news
What is the Home Quality Mark? Find out how it can help you when buying/renting a new home.
Business Secretary launches £246m Faraday Challenge to establish UK as world leader in battery technology.
Government announces new plans for regulations to improve safety and security awareness of drone users.
Read our introductory article to the various different types of fuel.
IHBC book review: Charles Barry’s monumental struggle to rebuild the Houses of Parliament.
Read about RSHP's British Museum extension which has been shortlisted for the 2017 Stirling Prize.
Read our introductory article to building a house extension.
More updates from DCMS about the large-scale testing of cladding systems and the number of buildings affected.
UandI secure resolution to grant planning consent for major new regeneration project.
IHBC article considers how heritage is dealt with when infrastructure schemes are authorised.
It was the tallest structure in the world for 3,800 years, but to this day the exact construction techniques are a mystery.
Shortlist for the industry's most coveted award announced.
Government responds to Mark Farmer's review of industry, rejecting the call for a levy on clients.