- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 12 Apr 2017
PAS 256: Buried assets
In April 2017, the Institution of Civil Engineers, in collaboration with BSI and Infrastructure UK in HM Treasury, published PAS 256, a national common code of practice on buried apparatus that can be implemented across the UK.
In recent years, with the growing concern over the level of traffic congestion, efforts have been made to improve the administration procedures for street works and to encourage utilities to minimise their work in the street.
However, despite some progress, there remains no central repository of data for buried services and underground apparatus, nor any consistent means of sharing the required data. Utilities that hold data on their own infrastructure do so in different formats – some vector-based, some on paper drawings, some on microfiche – which makes coordination of information challenging, costly and bureaucratic.
Improving the ready availability and exchange of asset information, together with more effective and collaborative planning and coordination will lead to better planned road works resulting in significant cost savings; more effective reinstatement practices; longer pavement life; and improved quality of advance information, readily available to all who need to see it.
Ultimately, it is hoped that the new PAS can support the creation of a coordinated digital map using real world location and deliver a step change in how effective, managed data supports improved planning, co-ordination and delivery.
 Who is this PAS for?
It will build on the existing legislation of the New Roads and Street Works Act (NRSWA) and take the next step forward from PAS 128: Specification for underground utility detection, verification and location (2014). PAS 128 set out the accuracy to which the data should be captured, the quality expected of the data and a means by which to assess and indicate the confidence that can be placed in the data.
 Aims of the PAS and why it should be used
- Drive towards improved accuracy when capturing and recording information.
- Share more accurate records collaboratively with those working in the vicinity of their buried assets.
- Improve the linkage between assets that are part of the critical national infrastructure with initiatives such as smart cities and BIM.
This PAS sets out a consistent, accessible data protocol to enable effective recording and sharing of the location, state, and nature of buried assets, and recommends how existing asset records should be updated, recorded and collated.
This PAS will also cover:
- The gathering of geospatial data using absolute or relative accuracy, plus associated evidence (such as photographic evidence).
- Measurable deviations from straight line installations where appropriate.
- The absolute depth of the asset.
- The number of days to record and make available the asset data, once collected.
- The sharing of collected asset data.
This article was originally published here on 11 Apr 2017 by ICE. It was written by Rabinder Phull.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building services engineer.
- Construction drones
- Crossrail 2.
- How to work safely on a construction site in the dark.
- Institution of Civil Engineers.
- Lighting of construction sites.
- Mechanical ventilation.
- Printing 3D models of buildings.
- Open data - how can it aid the development of the construction industry?
- Site appraisal.
- Site information.
Featured articles and news
How do we measure air tightness in buildings?
The Housing Infrastructure Fund
Encouraging access to local amenities and sustainable transport.
Publish your thought leadership articles on Designing Buildings Wiki – for free.
Competence Steering Group publishes interim proposals to deliver safer buildings.
Indoor environments should provide a multi-sensory experience.
We have a great range of introductory articles written by ECA.
7 of the most common myths, busted.
Consider a career in the electrotechnical industry.
Exploring local assets of community significance. Book review.