How to track progress on a BREEAM Project
 Information management or ‘tracker’ tools
- We find both IES Tap and Tracker Plus are excellent tools
- Project management software such as IES Tap and Tracker Plus are excellent tools which will help you compile and reference evidence
- We use Tracker+ with monthly reports sent out to design team
- We use Tracker+ and add comments to this which can be downloaded in report format, I have some project teams that are happy to log into this.
- From the principal contractor's point of view Tracker+ is the best, but only when used correctly as we have all the evidence in one place and can re-visit it. It saves us time and duplication of work.
- Tracker+ is good but sometimes hard to convince everyone to use it
 IES TaP
- We have used the IES TaP on projects. It has been very helpful for the entire project team for keep tracking of documents, progress and being transparent.
- IES Tap will allow you set up responsibilities and assign them to particular project team members.
- IES TaP is by far the most flexible and cohesive online BREEAM project tool, access and navigation across the platform is quick, easy and efficient, particularly like the way you can access uploaded evidence with just 2 mouse clicks and approve information with a specific reference & notes in less than a minute - this is critical as an assessor on multiple projects
- IES TaP allows assessors to manage projects far more efficiently than manually updated excel trackers - meaning more projects can be taken on by an assessor or assessor organisation without the risk of standards slipping.
- IES TaP provides a simple yet vast resource for clients and project team members to understand BREEAM requirements & deliverables. The way actions are tracked amongst the project team in a transparent manner provides motivation to individual consultants to complete them in a timely manner and reducing the amount of time the assessor takes chasing parties for their evidence.
- The report tools are simple, effective and can be filtered to identify a wide range of issues specific to the needs of the project team. This system allows the equivalent of excel trackers to be produced or updated with one mouse click - supremely more efficient than manual updates.
 Other software
- 4P - it may also called '4 Projects' or 'V for Projects'
- 4P or Conject are common examples of document management on sites. It’s useful when assessors have access to them as all design partners including contractors and sub-contractors feed their documents there already. It means that no one needs to copy and paste from one software to another.
- Most large project teams are familiar with using 4P and I generally ask if they can set up BREEAM folders on this which evidence can be linked to, I can then download this fairly easily and it saves times searching for evidence.
- I use ProjectPlac, it is similar to Tracker+
- 4P and other non BREEAM specific collaboration platforms can be a real problem in BREEAM assessment terms - they only provide flat folders in which to store evidence - feedback from the assessor is not tracked, its not easy to supersede or reject incorrect evidence and quite often its unclear when evidence is being provided on a large project where multiple documents are being uploaded on a daily basis.
- Beware that on large collaboration sites such as 4P your notifications on unrelated documents will probably fill your inbox on a regular basis. Its never easy to make these sites specific to the BREEAM issues.
- I like the systems offered on Tracker Plus. But most of my clients prefer Excel spreadsheets so that comments can be added
- I use only Excel. One column for each design team member allows to easily track who has to do what
- We tend to start in an Excel sheet and then move into Tracker+ particularly before design stage assessment as we submit the assessment through Tracker Plus. However we end up duplicating the updates on both Excel & Tracker plus. Now we are trying to move to Tracker+ early in Stage 3 and reduce reliance on Excel. Although we would have a one-page Excel summary (which is quick to update anyway).
- I found that using an Excel spreadsheet is the easiest way to go. I've tried to use software tools, but I had a hard time convincing other team members to login and use them as well.
- Excel will take some work at first to prepare, but once done, it will be the easiest for the project team to use and comprehend.
- A password protected Excel is better than PDF as it is more flexible.
- We don't normally issue the excel file, only a pdf, however if asked specifically for the excel sheet then we send it
- I'm amazed assessors are still using Excel spreadsheets, they are bulky, corruptable, time intensive and require constant update - online portal systems such as IES TaP take the manual resource out of updating excel spreadsheets and you also effectively write your BREEAM Assessment report as you go - so once all the evidence has been received your report should be almost fully written.
- Getting everyone to use the tool on a regular basis - is always a challenge
- I believe the biggest challenge is persuading BREEAM to move away from their extremely poor excel spreadsheet tools, which over the years have been, well, disastrous.
- The new BREEAM Projects page seems to be a bit more forward thinking but has still been executed poorly. Online BREEAM Project tools designed and developed by the private sector are far superior - as they have evolved from current assessors who have tried to develop a platform suitable of satisfying their day to day needs.
- Justifying the cost of private sector online BREEAM tools such as IES TaP & Tracker+ to a client for the first time is not easy, but in my experience the feedback and opinions of clients & consultants after using such tools are hugely positive and seen as excellent value for money - our clients feedback & satisfaction of the tools use is around 95% in favour.
 General communication
- When it comes to providing evidence on regular basis email is the best way
- I find clients prefer to email evidence rather than upload to each of the BREEAM issues
- Email issue of evidence is not ideal - they can often get lost within a busy inbox, subject titles can be misleading and attachments are easily corrupted or not backed up for recovery
- Quite often emails only go to one person, or one inbox, meaning a team of BREEAM Assessors working in a busy assessment organisation cannot access evidence when required or evidence can be misplaced.
- Presenting the trackers in regular (as a minimum, quarterly) meetings with the whole team present. Discuss responsibilities, changes, etc.
- Connection with the Client and project Team via phone/e-mail with monthly reports and schedule of tasks
- Issuing progress report to the project team is good to keep them up to date on what is still required
- Monthly progress reports which include a colour coded table for each credit are also an easy way to demonstrate what has been received and what is outstanding (e.g. credit is red for no evidence and green for all evidence requirements fulfilled)
--Multiple Author Article 21:52, 21 Apr 2018 (BST)
Issue support documents
|These are Multiple Author Articles - click on them and add to them today. It's easy.|
You can also add to General Multiple Author Articles here
Issue support documents are written for named BREEAM Issues or sub-issues. More info. (ac) = awaiting content
|Thanks to our Knowledge Sharing Ambassadors for a lot of this content|
- BREEAM Sustainability champion
- BREEAM Environmental management
- BREEAM Considerate construction
- BREEAM Monitoring of construction site impacts
- BREEAM Aftercare support
- BREEAM Seasonal commissioning
- BREEAM Testing and inspecting building fabric
- BREEAM Life cycle cost and service life planning
- BREEAM Stakeholder consultation (ac)
- BREEAM Commissioning (ac)
- BREEAM Handover (ac)
- BREEAM Inclusive and accessible design (ac)
- BREEAM Post occupancy evaluation
 Health and Wellbeing
- BREEAM Visual comfort Daylighting (partly ac)
- BREEAM Visual comfort View out
- BREEAM Visual comfort Glare control
- BREEAM Indoor air quality plan
- BREEAM Indoor air quality Ventilation
- BREEAM Thermal comfort
- BREEAM Internal and external lighting (ac)
- BREEAM Indoor pollutants VOCs (ac)
- BREEAM Potential for natural ventilation (ac)
- BREEAM Safe containment in laboratories (ac)
- BREEAM Acoustic performance
- BREEAM Safety and security (ac)
- BREEAM Reduction of energy use and carbon emissions
- BREEAM Energy monitoring
- BREEAM External lighting
- BREEAM Low carbon design
- BREEAM Passive design
- BREEAM Free cooling
- BREEAM LZC technologies
- BREEAM Energy efficient cold storage (partly ac)
- BREEAM Energy efficient transportation systems
- BREEAM Energy efficient laboratory systems
- BREEAM Energy efficient equipment (partly ac)
- BREEAM Drying space
- BREEAM Transport assessment and travel plan
- BREEAM Public transport accessibility
- BREEAM Sustainable transport measures
- BREEAM Proximity to amenities
- BREEAM Cyclist facilities
- BREEAM Alternative modes of transport (ac)
- BREEAM Maximum car parking capacity
- BREEAM Travel plan
- BREEAM Home office (ac)
- BREEAM Water consumption
- BREEAM Water efficient equipment
- BREEAM Water monitoring
- BREEAM Water leak detection (ac)
- BREEAM Hard landscaping and boundary protection
- BREEAM Responsible sourcing of materials
- BREEAM Insulation
- BREEAM Designing for durability and resilience
- BREEAM Life cycle impacts
- BREEAM Material efficiency (ac)
- BREEAM Construction waste management
- BREEAM Recycled aggregates
- BREEAM Speculative floor & ceiling finishes
- BREEAM Adaptation to climate change
- BREEAM Operational waste
- BREEAM Functional adaptability (ac)
 Land Use and Ecology
- BREEAM Site Selection
- BREEAM Ecological value of site
- BREEAM Protection of ecological features
- BREEAM Minimising impact on existing site ecology
- BREEAM Enhancing site ecology
- BREEAM Long term impact on biodiversity (ac)
- BREEAM Impact of refrigerants
- BREEAM NOx emissions
- BREEAM Flood risk management (ac)
- BREEAM Surface water run-off (ac)
- BREEAM Reduction of night time light pollution (partly ac)
- BREEAM Reduction of noise pollution
Once an ISD has been initially created the '(ac)' marker can be removed
This particular index is based around the structure of the New Construction and RFO schemes.