London's Blue Ribbon Network
London’s strategic water network, described as the “Blue Ribbon Network” covers the River Thames, canals, tributary rivers, lakes, reservoirs, docks and other waterbodies. This water network is an invaluable resource which has connected the capital since the Industrial Revolution. The Blue Ribbon Network extends to every London borough, and it is this connection with water that gives the capital its picturesque character.
Once the primary means of transportation, the water network has been a big contributor to the successful development of the capital in the past; and yet today the waterways in London are experiencing constant degradation.
With the expansion of roadways, waterways started to lose economic significance and they are now no longer used in the same way as before. Nevertheless, as road congestion continues to rise and inner-city air quality deteriorates, London is revisiting water transportation opportunities.
Water transportation can have multiple environmental and social benefits over road transportation. Environmental benefits can be achieved owing to significantly lower carbon emissions[1]; and social benefits are achieved due to reduced congestion on London’s road network, reduced accidents and road maintenance, reduced noise pollution and so on[2]. A modal shift in transportation, where feasible, is a good opportunity to make the capital a healthier and better city for all that live here.
With London’s ever-changing skyline, construction transportation has been identified as a significant contributor to transportation emissions and road congestion. Exploiting the waterways can provide the construction sector with a good opportunity to reduce emissions and social impact. With that in view, many new developments are being encouraged to maximise the use of waterways for the transportation of building materials and construction waste.
KLH undertook a detailed study to evaluate the feasibility of water transportation for a mixed-use development project on the River Lee Navigation. The project, in theory, is ideally located with direct access to the waterway. However, the study found several limitations to exploitation of the waterways due to the lack of efficient infrastructure along the network.
The main logistical issues emerged from the lack of public wharves with cargo handling capabilities and the extensive network of publicly-accessible towpaths that restrict safe, direct access to the waterways. Furthermore, longer travel durations[3] and double handling significantly increase the cost of waterway logistics.
Based on the Department for Transport’s modal shift benefit figures, the higher logistics cost was found to largely outweigh the overall social benefit value, apart from bulk disposal of excavation waste. These findings are supported by several other studies. Consequently, the only major project currently under construction in the capital using barge transportation is the Thames Tideway Tunnel; with its Thames-side mass excavations, it is a perfect candidate for water logistics.
The social benefits of water logistics are significant, and the City of London would do well to protect existing wharves and continue to support the waste and materials handling facilities that have historically made their home in these key locations. While housing provision is an issue, and waterside locations carry an obvious premium, some of the intrinsic value of our waterways is the sight of a working vessel transporting goods and materials into the heart of the City. Hopefully, with the New London Plan’s recognition of this important resource, the capacity of the city’s waterways to support a sustainable future will be better exploited.
____________________________________________________________
[1] Figures published by DECC and DEFRA indicate that the emissions associated with water transport are significantly lower, at almost a fifth compared to road transport. (kgCO2e/tonne-km)
[2] Department for Transport’s (DfT) Mode Shift Benefit Values: Technical Report
[3] Barges used for transportation of construction materials can usually move at a speed of 3-4miles per hour, thus requiring considerably longer duration for transportation. Travel duration can be further affected because of tidal impacts and number of locks along the navigation path.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Professional practical experience for Architects in training
The long process to transform the nature of education and professional practical experience in the Architecture profession following recent reports.
A people-first approach to retrofit
Moving away from the destructive paradigm of fabric-first.
International Electrician Day, 10 June 2025
Celebrating the role of electrical engineers from André-Marie Amperè, today and for the future.
New guide for clients launched at Houses of Parliament
'There has never been a more important time for clients to step up and ...ask the right questions'
The impact of recycled slate tiles
Innovation across the decades.
EPC changes for existing buildings
Changes and their context as the new RdSAP methodology comes into use from 15 June.
Skills England publishes Sector skills needs assessments
Priority areas relating to the built environment highlighted and described in brief.
BSRIA HVAC Market Watch - May 2025 Edition
Heat Pump Market Outlook: Policy, Performance & Refrigerant Trends for 2025–2028.
Committing to EDI in construction with CIOB
Built Environment professional bodies deepen commitment to EDI with two new signatories: CIAT and CICES.
Government Grenfell progress report at a glance
Line by line recomendation overview, with links to more details.
An engaging and lively review of his professional life.
Sustainable heating for listed buildings
A problem that needs to be approached intelligently.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson apprentice award
Deadline for entries has been extended to Friday 27 June, so don't miss out!
CIAT at the London Festival of Architecture
Designing for Everyone: Breaking Barriers in Inclusive Architecture.
Mixed reactions to apprenticeship and skills reform 2025
A 'welcome shift' for some and a 'backwards step' for others.