Last edited 02 Dec 2020

Speculative construction

Canary wharf.jpg

The term 'speculative construction' (or speculative development) describes a process in which unused land is purchased or a building project is undertaken with no formal commitment from any end users.

In other words, the end user of the development is unknown, but the developer is nonetheless confident not only that they will be able to find a one, but that the type of development they are undertaking will be suitable. This is in contrast to custom building, when a builder is contracted for a specific development by a client who is able to provide a brief for what they want.

Examples of speculative construction include:

Speculative developers typically profit from carefully timing the buying and selling of land. Land for office or housing developments can often be purchased at a cheaper rate during a market depression, and then sold once developed, when the market has recovered. However, there is a very high risk in this, as the costs are very high, the timescales are long, and the consequences of misjudging the market and not finding a buyer are very serious.

It is relatively common for speculative developments to remain empty, or partially empty for a long time after completion, and for developers themselves to go bankrupt.

Considering whether to undertake a project will depend on a range of conditions, including:

It is rare that large-scale speculative developments such as offices will be undertaken by anyone other than the largest developers, as the amount of investment and duration can be prohibitive. However, building companies speculating on small-scale industrial developments are more common.

It is also common with owner-occupied housing, where there is a relatively short build time, limited capital is tied up in building work-in-progress, and there may be greater willingness from commercial banks to extend credit on the security of land holdings.

The notoriety of speculative development rose in particular in the 1980s when the deregulation of the financial sector, and a growth in international financing lead to a speculative property boom, with a number of very significant commercial developments undertaken in the City of London, Canary Wharf, Leeds and Manchester.

More recently, speculative developers have come under fire for holding sites that have yet to be constructed. This so-called 'landbanking' has drawn political and public criticism, especially in relation to the housing shortage, with a belief that developers regulate the supply of land in order to artificially inflate prices.

'Landbanks' can provide speculative developers a certain degree of market power, as they are not compelled to buy land at specific times or locations in order to build and can instead run down their existing portfolio until market conditions become more favourable. In cities such as London in particular, the rapid increase in the value of land can make land banking a lucrative investment.

However, developers have repeatedly rebutted the accusation of landbanking, claiming that many undeveloped sites are actually owned by owner-occupiers, historic land owners, the government and investment funds. See Landbanking for more information.

See also: Speculatice architecture.

[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki

Designing Buildings Anywhere

Get the Firefox add-on to access 20,000 definitions direct from any website

Find out more Accept cookies and
don't show me this again