- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 28 Nov 2018
Key Brexit challenges facing infrastructure and construction
[Image © Josh Howard]
With so much important work yet to be completed, it is critical that government and industry engage throughout the negotiation period to ensure desirable outcomes that support ongoing UK infrastructure investment. Here are some key considerations.
From 2012-2016, the EIB invested more than €31bn in the UK economy. If this role is diminished, then government should immediately consider alternative options for cheap finance – such as a national infrastructure bank – to fill that gap.
There has been a shortage of labour in the building and construction sector for several years. Brexit uncertainty around the status of EU nationals only amplifies this risk, and is a significant concern in London and the south-east.
For more information, see Skills shortage and Brexit.
 Global hub
International businesses benefit massively by the mobility of labour and being able to attract talent from across the world – not just Europe. Government should continue to build on the UK’s reputation as a global hub of excellence for infrastructure development, operations and finance.
The UK has established leaders in engineering and construction, debt and equity providers as well as financial and legal experts thanks to a productive mix of public and private investment in the countries energy, transport, water and social infrastructure sectors.
A long-term strategy and healthy pipeline of future opportunities would help retain this talent and maintain this enviable status.
The building and construction sector is particularly exposed to rising import prices. On average around 20-30% of materials are imported from the EU, so the drop in the value of the pound is gradually feeding through to increased construction pricing. This is putting further pressure on project affordability and the low margins of these businesses.
Government needs to consider the impact of potential tariffs in its negotiation strategy, improve the domestic supply chain or find alternative trading partners to source cost effective materials from.
Infrastructure businesses may delay significant capital expenditure until there is more certainty on the UK’s future relationship with Europe. For example, construction in the commercial sector might stall as companies hold back on new development decisions.
In two years’ time as the government comes out of Brexit negotiations – when those investment decisions would ordinarily culminate in breaking ground – the order books of commercial construction firms might be lean.
So it’s imperative that the Government drive its domestic infrastructure agenda – such as affordable homes, digital infrastructure and transport – throughout the negotiation period to keep work orders flowing.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles by ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- 2017 General Election manifestos.
- Building an industrial strategy.
- Brexit - the case for infrastructure.
- Brexit Topic Guide.
- Overcoming the challenges of Brexit.
- Post-Brexit vision for construction.
- Safeguarding infrastructure post-Brexit.
- Skills shortage and Brexit.
- Triggering article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon.
- Will Brexit shake UK construction?
Featured articles and news
A review of Scotland’s historic lighthouses.
Choosing the most suitable heating system.
Another year of growth, says BSRIA.
Property practices to help tenant retention.
Fire rips through HPL cladding in Bolton.
Disturbing complacency over short courses.
The new science of building engineering physics.
How new technologies and processes could impact on energy efficiency and wellbeing.
BRE launches the BREEAM Data Centres Annex Pilot.
Replacing lanterns and overthrows in Great Pulteney Street.
Will market-led regeneration work without state intervention?
The New Towns