Information Rejection
Contents |
[edit] Background
BIM protocols for an organisation or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.
What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design based on 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the collaborative process will not adequately take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.
A disparity and time shift between the live 3D federated models typically exchanged fortnightly on the CDE and the exo-BIM derived design occurs, this results in inacuracy, failure to collaborate effectively, delays on site and reduced overall value to the client.
[edit] Concept
"Information Rejection". IR is the scenario whereby an Appointed Party or supplier attempts to exchange files on a CDE that are:
- Not derived from the project team's 3D BIM volume(s)
- CAD files reverse BIM'd in to 3D volumes by a third party
- Exo-BIM data not exported from the BIM volumes e.g. manually added to spreadsheets
- Non-compliant with project BIM protocols
- 2D Drawings not derived from the 3D BIM volume(s)
The potential consequences for having exchange information rejected are:
- Responsibility for causing delays
- Charges imposed for delays
- Percentage of fees withheld
- Termination of appointment
[edit] Detection
To detect the occurence of attempts to exchange drawings and data not derived from the required 'live' 3D BIM volume, the BIM protocols must state that any file exchanged on the CDE must have an associated 3D BIM Volume to verify as the source of that information.
Where a clear disparity between the two occurs, or there is an absence of a 3D BIM Volume to verify the drawing or data against. That will be deemed a breach of the agreed rules and information Rejection will be the resulting action.
[edit] Action
In the BEP cite a reference to the UK BIM Framework's "Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery".
According to Table 12 in the aforementioned UK BIM Framework document, when exchanged information is audited and verified at Status S6, if rejected the status will be reduced to S0 "Work in Progress and not yet suitable to be Shared outside the task team.".
Read the references to information acceptance and rejection defined within the aforementioned reference and have the Information Manager and Document Controller implement it via the protocols. See Prevention.
[edit] Prevention
Create a BIM Services Agreement or similar, to be signed by each Appointed Party or Supplier in a Task Team prior to appointment to a project.
Amongst the descriptions of how and why Appointed Party's must read and understand the BIM protocols, it will be necessary to define the resulting actions that will be applied to the responsible party when their exchanged information on the CDE is discovered to be derived from exo-BIM sources and methods.
In the BIM Execution Plan under standards applied, cite the UK BIM Framework's "Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery".
[edit] Exemplar
Below is a typical example of how to define the circumstances and outcomes to the Appointed Party(s) if they fail to apply BIM processes in their design and exchanged files:
Information Rejection:
Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data files exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Asset information requirements AIR.
- BIM articles.
- BIM dimensions.
- BIM execution plan.
- BIM glossary of terms.
- BIM maturity levels.
- BIM resources.
- Construction Operations Building Information Exchange (COBie).
- Common data environment.
- Data drops..
- Digital information.
- Digital model.
- Federated building information model.
- Government Soft Landings.
- Industry Foundation Classes.
- Information management.
- Revit.
- Uniclass.
[edit] External references
See Sections 1.3/1.4 and Table 12 in the UK BIM Framework: Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery below:
ISO-19650-Guidance-Part-2-Single-Page-Print.pdf (ukbimframework.org)
Featured articles and news
International Electrician Day, 10 June 2025
Celebrating the role of electrical engineers from André-Marie Amperè, today and for the future.
New guide for clients launched at Houses of Parliament
'There has never been a more important time for clients to step up and ...ask the right questions'
The impact of recycled slate tiles
Innovation across the decades.
EPC changes for existing buildings
Changes and their context as the new RdSAP methodology comes into use from 15 June.
Skills England publishes Sector skills needs assessments
Priority areas relating to the built environment highlighted and described in brief.
BSRIA HVAC Market Watch - May 2025 Edition
Heat Pump Market Outlook: Policy, Performance & Refrigerant Trends for 2025–2028.
Committing to EDI in construction with CIOB
Built Environment professional bodies deepen commitment to EDI with two new signatories: CIAT and CICES.
Government Grenfell progress report at a glance
Line by line recomendation overview, with links to more details.
An engaging and lively review of his professional life.
Sustainable heating for listed buildings
A problem that needs to be approached intelligently.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson apprentice award
Deadline for entries has been extended to Friday 27 June, so don't miss out!
CIAT at the London Festival of Architecture
Designing for Everyone: Breaking Barriers in Inclusive Architecture.
Mixed reactions to apprenticeship and skills reform 2025
A 'welcome shift' for some and a 'backwards step' for others.
Licensing construction in the UK
As the latest report and proposal to licence builders reaches Parliament.
Building Safety Alliance golden thread guidance
Extensive excel checklist of information with guidance document freely accessible.
Fair Payment Code and other payment initiatives
For fair and late payments, need to work together to add value.
Pre-planning delivery programmes and delay penalties
Proposed for housebuilders in government reform: Speeding Up Build Out.
High street health: converting a building for healthcare uses
The benefits of health centres acting as new anchor sites in the high street.