- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 19 Jul 2021
Cost-benefit analysis in construction
A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a systematic process in which decisions relating to proposals are analysed to determine whether the benefits outweigh the costs, and by what margin. A CBA serves as a basis for comparing alternatives proposals and making informed decisions about whether to proceed.
In terms of proposed developments, by evaluating all the potential costs, and comparing these with possible revenues and other benefits that might derive from a new building, a developer is able to assess whether the proposal is financially worthwhile or whether an alternative is needed.
The first step typically involves listing, in as much detail as possible, all the costs and benefits that are associated with the project. Costs could include direct and indirect costs, hard and soft costs, opportunity costs and the cost of potential risks. Benefits could include direct and indirect benefits, and intangible benefits (e.g. increased productivity and cost savings). It is better to be conservative with the benefits as an over-estimation (or under-estimation of the costs) will result in an inaccurate CBA.
Once the list has been made, a common unit of monetary measurement should be applied to all the items before quantitatively comparing them to ascertain whether the benefits outweigh the costs. If they do not, then a review should be undertaken to determine how the benefits might be increased and/or the costs decreased to try and make the project financially viable.
If, once this is done, the benefits are still outweighed by the costs, it may be necessary to reassess whether the project should proceed as planned. If the benefits outweigh the costs then the project can be taken forward to the next stage of planning.
As an assessment tool, CBA is of more value for smaller construction projects with a length of time to completion that is short to intermediate. This is because greater accuracy in the cost estimating can be achieved. Larger projects with a long programme may be exposed to more cost uncertainties (e.g. interest rates, inflation, availability of labour, price of materials, etc.). For these larger and more uncertain projects, analysis models that may be more suitable include net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR).
For more information see:
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
So why not write something?
LETI publishes guidance for energy efficient home retrofits.
Predictions about adequate post-pandemic IAQ in non-domestic buildings.
Government publishes plans to 'build back greener'.
The contentious nature of claims associated with cladding, fire safety and EWS1 forms.
ECA comments on low-carbon heating systems initiative and Heat and Buildings Strategy.
Cinders and other forms of domestic rubbish created filth but also generated great wealth.
CIC 2050 Group requests input to find out priorities for future industry leaders.
IHBC publishes response to consultation.