- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 18 Feb 2019
Cost-benefit analysis in construction
A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a systematic process in which decisions relating to proposals are analysed to determine whether the benefits outweigh the costs, and by what margin. A CBA serves as a basis for comparing alternatives proposals and making informed decisions about whether to proceed.
In terms of proposed developments, evaluating all the potential costs, and comparing these with possible revenues and other benefits that might derive from a new building, a developer is able to assess whether the proposal is financially worthwhile or whether an alternative is needed.
The first step typically involves listing, in as much detail as possible, all the costs and benefits that are associated with the project. Costs could include direct and indirect costs, hard and soft costs, opportunity costs, cost of potential risks, and so on. Benefits could include direct and indirect benefits, intangible benefits (e.g. increased productivity, cost savings, etc.), and so on. It is better to be conservative with the benefits as an over-estimation (or under-estimation of the costs) will result in an inaccurate CBA.
Once the list has been made, a common unit of monetary measurement should be applied to all the items before quantitatively comparing them to ascertain whether the benefits outweigh the costs. If they do not, then a review should be undertaken to determine how the benefits might be increased and/or the costs decreased to try and make the project financially viable.
If, once this is done, the benefits are still outweighed by the costs, it may be necessary to reassess whether the project should proceed as planned. If the benefits outweigh the costs then the project can be taken forward to the next stage of planning.
As an assessment tool, CBA is of more value for smaller construction projects with a length of time to completion that is short to intermediate. This is because greater accuracy in the cost estimating can be achieved. Larger projects with a long programme may be exposed to more cost uncertainties (e.g. interest rates, inflation, availability of labour, price of materials, etc.). For these larger and more uncertain projects, analysis models that may be more suitable include net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR).
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Base cost estimate.
- Best value.
- Capital costs.
- Cost of building.
- Cost plans.
- Development appraisal.
- Internal rate of return for property development.
- Initial cost appraisal.
- Net Present Value.
 External references
Featured articles and news
Rebuilding could take 20 to 40 years.
RSHP’s high-rise residential towers win a tall buildings award for excellence.
BSRIA study reveals strong growth in 2018.
Dame Judith Hackitt confirmed as keynote speaker – one year on from the Hackitt Report.
Save £100 on tickets.
Modern slavery in the construction sector.
What to bear in mind when claiming damages in construction.
How do we achieve sustainable clean-water infrastructure for all?
What you should know when appointing an architect.
A brief history plus some new developments.
How computational fluid dynamics (CFD) helps building design.
The Hong Kong Harbour Area Treatment Scheme (HATS).
'Expressions of interest' for construction contracts.