Basic BREEAM Process
Contents |
[edit] Aim and benefits
How does BREEAM happen, where to start, how does it run.
[edit] When to consider
If BREEAM is to be pursued on a project it should be approached from the very beginning of the process. There are a lot of things that need considered not just in the design and choice of site but also the management of the job. The sooner the better.
Having a BREEAM assessor or BREEAM AP (accredited professional) on board early will ensure credits which need considered early are highlighted.
[edit] Step-by-step guidance
BREEAM is considered at the earliest point in the job.
A BREEAM Assessor and / or BREEAM AP is appointed early and a BREEAM pre-assessment workshop held with the whole design team. This will allow the team to discuss what they want the development to achieve, what is possible and what needs to be reviewed and considered. The BREEAM rating that is being aimed for should be agreed.
When it is known a BREEAM assessment is definitely going to be carried out, the site should be registered.
After the pre-assessment workshop it is important that stage dependent credits are being followed. The project manager should be fully aware of the requirements so the process is smooth. A BREEAM AP is a great benefit for this reason.
During the design stage the evidence for the design stage process should be submitted to the BREEAM assessor for review. Once all of the BREEAM evidence is submitted and approved by the assessor the assessment is submitted to the BRE for Quality Assurance (QA) and certification.
The QA process can mean some queries are received and the assessor and design team will need to address these and resubmit for certification. The queries can range from missing evidence to apparent non-compliances.
Once all QA comments are closed out the project will received its interim design stage certificate.
Once the project is on site the Assessor may have a BREEAM kick off meeting with the construction team so they are fully aware of the requirements of the BREEAM assessment. This assists in the smooth running of the post construction assessment.
Evidence for the post construction assessment should be submitted as it becomes available. The majority of evidence will be available near competition.
The assessor will carry out several site inspections during construction. This will vary depending on the size of the project. Bigger projects may need more inspection.
Once all post construction evidence has been submitted to and approved by the BREEAM Assessor the assessment is submitted to the BRE for QA and certification. Again queries from the QA team may be received back, in which case they will need addressed and the assessment resubmitted.
Once all QA comments are closed out the project will receive its final BREEAM certificate.
[edit] Questions to ask while seeking compliance
- What features do we want this building to have?
- How sustainable do we want this building to be?
- What are the most important design elements to us?
- Does BREEAM assist with this?
- Do we want recognised for our efforts through BREEAM?
[edit] Tools and resources
[edit] Tips and best practice
Having a good line of communication with the BREEAM Assessor or BREEAM AP will be of a great benefit to the project and design team. A helpful and supportive BREEAM AP will assist the team in delivering compliance and facilitate more straight forward certification.
BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of this content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- An introduction to BREEAM.
- Building Research Establishment.
- BREEAM and CEEQUAL.
- BREEAM In-Use International.
- BREEAM USA.
- Code for Sustainable Homes.
- Green rating systems.
- Iran - market potential for BREEAM.
- Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.
- Passivhaus.
- Ska rating.
- Sustainability.
- WELL and BREEAM align.
Featured articles and news
What they are, how they work and why they are popular in many countries.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.
Biomass harvested in cycles of less than ten years.
An interview with the new CIAT President
Usman Yaqub BSc (Hons) PCIAT MFPWS.
Cost benefit model report of building safety regime in Wales
Proposed policy option costs for design and construction stage of the new building safety regime in Wales.
Do you receive our free biweekly newsletter?
If not you can sign up to receive it in your mailbox here.

























