Advanced network planning
Programmes describe the sequence in which tasks must be carried out so that a project (or part of a project) can be completed on time.
Programmes will often identify:
- Dates and durations allocated to tasks.
- A critical path (the sequence of critical tasks upon which the overall duration of the programme is dependent).
- Tasks which can only be carried out after other tasks have been completed.
- Tasks which can be carried out simultaneously.
- 'Float' within tasks that are not on the critical path (that is, delays that can be incurred without affecting the critical path).
- The need for specific resources such as plant, services or materials and their lead time.
Developing a programme for a project can be very complex, as there are a great number of interrelated activities to consider, a change in any one of which may impact on all the others.
Advanced network planning is a process that can be used for planning, scheduling and controlling projects (or programmes – that is portfolios of projects) that consist of a large number of interrelated activities.
Network planning techniques first developed in the 1950s and included techniques such as:
- The Critical Path Method (CPM).
- The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT).
- The Precedence Diagramming Method (PDM).
- The Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT).
- Systematic Network Planning (SNP).
Very broadly, these describe projects as a network of tasks, the interrelationships between which can be used to establish the most appropriate moment for their execution in order to complete the overall project on time.
Creating a network includes a number of steps:
- All the project activities are identified and defined.
- The technological sequence between activities is defined.
- A network is constructed which shows the relative priority of those relationships.
- The execution periods for each activity are estimated.
- The critical path is calculated.
- As time goes on and more information is acquired, the network is revised and re-evaluated.
A typical network will include a set of “arrow diagrams” which go from the origin node to the destination node. In this sense, the path is defined as a sequence of connected activities, which flow from the start of the project (node 1) to the end. The time required to follow one of these paths is the sum of the times corresponding to each of the activities. The critical path is that which requires the longest time to progress from inception to completion, and indicates the minimum timeframe required to complete the whole project.
Complex models can be developed that include additional information such as cost information, and may represent:
- Variables: Aspects in the model that can be changed, such as product type.
- Sensitivities: How much performance changes in response to variable changes.
- Scenarios: The range of possible changes to the network.
This is a complex specialist process that is simplified by the use of software that carries out analysis automatically and outputs results in ways that are easier for the project team to digest, such as gantt charts.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
OMA's plans for new arts centre to revitalise city's culture given planning approval.
Select committee criticises DEFRA for failing to take up its recommendations.
Nicola Sturgeon presents ICE's People's Choice Award to the Forth Road Bridge reopening.
Green paper published for consultation.
Mental health issues effect 80% of construction workers. Read our interview with the founders of a new wellbeing initiative.
Would Stephenson be disappointed by the lack of progress on the high speed transport of Hyperloop?
The immersive pop-up cinema experience that could revolutionise on-site health and safety training.
5 out of 10 filtering facepieces fail HSE tests.
Eleven Magazine announce the winner and runners-up in their Moontopia competition.
As January is the time for hitting the gym, Designing Buildings Wiki lists the best gym architecture in the world.
London is at the top of the list of global construction megacities, beating Dubai and Abu Dhabi.