Programmes describe the sequence in which tasks must be carried out so that a project (or part of a project) can be completed on time.
Programmes may identify:
- Dates and durations allocated to tasks.
- A critical path.
- Tasks which can only be carried out after other tasks have been completed.
- Tasks which can be carried out simultaneously.
- 'Float' within tasks that are not on the critical path.
- The need for specific resources such as plant, services or materials and their lead time.
On small, straight-forward projects, or projects where there are no complex relationships with other activities, a programme might be prepared by the lead consultant (perhaps the architect) or by a project manager. On large projects, the client may appoint a programme consultant to prepare a detailed programme for the project including an outline programme for construction if a contractor has not been appointed. Once the contractor is appointed, they will take responsibility for programming the construction works, but the programme consultant may continue to develop an overall programme for the client.
- Land acquisition.
- Design programme.
- Procurement of equipment, furniture and so on.
- Migrating into and occupation of the new building.
There may be complex relationships between these activities that mean they all need to appear on a single, overall programme, and this may include activities that are beyond the remit of the contractor, consultants, or project manager. It is important therefore that the project team is clear which aspects of the programme they are responsible for.
On projects where there is early contractor involvement, such as design and build, construction management or management contracts, the contractor, construction manager or management contractor may take responsibility for programming the project, including the design programme. However, the client may still have additional activities that they may need either arrange to include in the scope of that programme, or to programme separately, perhaps with help from a programme consultant.
It is particularly important that the client’s decision making process is properly reflected in the overall programme. Decisions often appear as milestones on programmes, with no consideration given to whether the individuals required to make the decision will be available, or how long it might take to make that decision. Wherever possible key client decisions should be programmed to take place at existing meetings, with briefing material issued in advance, enabling the client to make informed decisions.
It is important that the programme is realistic from the outset. The client and project team can lose confidence in a programme if deadlines continuously slip. The programme consultant must actively determine the duration of and relationship between activities, and must monitor whether deadlines are being, or are likely to be met. This might mean for example, meeting with consultants to get them to agree to a design programme and then monitoring progress, determining the lead times for unusual or critical items and so on.
There is no point in simply reporting back to people what they already know, they should be providing advice about aspects of the project that are likely to impact on the programme, and to give early warning about activities that may fall behind.
What should or can be done about programme problems will depend both on what is permitted within the project contracts, and the good will of members of the project team. Whilst the construction contract is likely to include penalties for failing to complete on time or for failing to meet key deadlines, the design programme may not, and even if it does, it may be difficult to enforce. During the early stages, programme problems can be due in part to the activities of third parties outside the consultant’s control such as planning authorities, client or stakeholder actions, consultation processes and so on, and generally, the only recourse the client has is to threaten termination for non-performance in the event of consistent programme failure.
The role of the programme consultant can therefore be one of advocate and arbitrator, evaluating and balancing conflicting requirements to deliver within the client’s timeframe.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Activity schedule.
- Appointing consultants.
- CDM planning period.
- Contractor's master programme.
- Critical path method.
- Design programme.
- Earned value.
- Fast-track construction.
- Gantt chart.
- Information release schedules.
- Key performance indicators.
- Lead time.
- Pre-construction information.
- Programme for building design and construction
- Progress of construction works.
- Scheduling construction activities.
- Short period programme.
 External references
Featured articles and news
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.
Sir Oliver Letwin to lead an independent review into the delays in the delivery of housing.
As Carillion collapses, read our article explaining insolvency in the construction industry.
43,000 jobs at risk as Carillion declares insolvency.