Thermal comfort and wellbeing
The thermal comfort of an occupant can affect his or her wellbeing in a number of ways. This article will go through some of these, following on from a description of thermal comfort and how it can be quantified.
The thermal comfort of a person is described as 'that condition of mind that expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment and is assessed by subjective evaluation'. CIBSE comfort guide states the main aim is "to keep most of the people happy most of the time" (Race G.)
The thermal comfort of an individual is personal and varies greatly from person to person and gender.
The subjective evaluation usually suggests a survey is needed to get the personal input from each of the occupants of a building. The large range of conditions and number of people required to give proper averages make this impractical in the majority of cases and cannot be done pre-occupation.
A different approach consists of measuring environmental conditions and then calculating the thermal comfort indices, which relate to the measured values and calculated indices as if a range of people were surveyed.
The standards BS EN ISO 7730 and ASHRAE 55 give methods for taking the environmental measurements and subsequent calculations to give quantified numbers to compare thermal comfort between buildings and different conditions within the same building. The measured values required by the standard are; air speed, turbulence intensity (using the standard deviation of air speed), air temperature, black globe temperature/operative temperature and relative humidity.
- The Draught risk is an indication of the percentage of people that would perceive a draught given the measured conditions and uses air temperature, air speed and turbulence intensity.
- The PMV is a prediction of the average vote of a large group of people occupying the space as if a survey was conducted on a scale of -3 to +3; where '-3' indicates feeling cold, '+3' indicates feeling hot and '0' is comfortable.
- The PPD is an estimate of the percentage of people who would find the space uncomfortable, based on the PMV results.
The calculations of PMV and PPD take into consideration the insulation provided by clothing (CLO) and the activity of the people working/living in the space (MET).
The CLO is a measure of the average clothing insulation and the MET is a measure of the heat output from an average person doing a stated task in the space. The standards give methods to calculate the CLO and MET for a space, however, the actual individual values can change drastically depending on the occupiers of the space, e.g. an office space versus a supermarket or factory floor where the activity level is significantly different, therefore the specific CLO and MET must be chosen carefully to give true indicative values of PMV and PPD.
One thing to note is that the PPD has a calculated minimum of 5%, as for the CLO and MET there will always be some people who will feel either hot or cold, however, this is normally compensated by changing an individual’s CLO, i.e. if a person is in an office and wearing a jacket, and the dress code allows, they will remove it when feeling hot, etc.
The effect on wellbeing of thermal comfort is becoming a focus of study and is coming to the attention of building owners and occupiers. The reason for the focus is that detrimental thermal comfort can have a significant effect on the morale and in some cases even the mental and physical health of the occupants of any building.
Problems with morale or health can affect productivity. A measurement of the thermal comfort, either pre-occupation by heat-load testing or of the occupied building, can identify problems or show that the building conforms with the expected comfort levels required, e.g. the BS EN ISO 7730 standard has classifications of the space depending on the PMV, PPD and other factors.
The distraction caused by adverse thermal comfort can be significant and can lead to occupants feeling the space is uncomfortable even if the conditions in the space improve, e.g. either through changes to the ventilation system, or by moving an individual to a more suitable thermal environment. If a space is felt to be too hot or too cold for too long and no actions are taken, the perception of the occupants can become biased. Perceived long term thermal discomfort can be hard to dispel and productivity can be negatively affected.
This article was originally published here by BSRIA in Jan 2017. It was written by Calum Maclean, Senior Research Engineer, BSRIA Sustainable Construction Group, but has subsequently been edited by others. See the article history for more information.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- A Practical Guide to Building Thermal Modelling.
- BSRIA articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Building related illness.
- Indoor air quality.
- Overheating in homes – BSRIA residential network event.
- Sick building syndrome.
- Temperature in buildings.
- Thermal comfort in buildings.
- What we know about wellbeing.
Featured articles and news
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.