Non-discriminatory building design
This article needs more work. To help develop this article, click 'Edit this article' above.
Over the last two to three decades there has been great progress in making the built environment (buildings, streets and transportation) more accessible, especially for people with disabilities and access problems. This is reflected in the introduction of Acts, codes, standards and regulations such as the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA 1995) and it’s successor the Equality Act (2010). For buildings, more specific requirements are stipulated in the Building Regulations Part M (2004, amended 2013) and in British Standards. NB See Access and inclusion in the built environment: policy and guidance for more information.
 Experiential discrimination
Experiential discrimination occurs when not all users get to enjoy the same experience of a building or building feature. For example, there should be one entrance that serves, rather than a “special” entrance for wheelchair users. Such discrimination should designed-out when consideration is made of people's different strengths and weaknesses in physical, sensory and cognitive areas (including phobias).
An example of experiential discrimination is when a building has a central area that is served by escalators. Those who do not wish to use, or cannot safely use, the escalators require a lift. The lift should have a window so that those who use it are not denied the experience of appreciating the space (and also to support those with claustrophobia). A further, enclosed lift would support those who have agoraphobia (fear of open spaces, or those spaces perceived as hard to escape from). Passengers would thus be given a choice of lift type to better serve their preferences.
For those who find long distances a barrier, good design would provide seating at intervals to allow rest and recovery. This is of particular importance on staircases where seats half way up a staircase can enable people to rest with dignity. A flip-down seat in a lift can offer respite in crowded lifts, or if lift journey times are long.
The built environment is predominantly designed for right-handed users (in terms of door openings, light switch locations, etc.), however, studies have shown that between 10 and 30% of the population is left-handed. Additionally, people who have strokes are often affected on the left-hand side of the brain, which affects the right-hand side of the body.
Signage can also be misinterpreted. The international sign for disability is the white wheelchair symbol on a blue background. This is not meant to be a “for wheelchair users” sign but is often interpreted as such. A pregnant lady, for example, may see the symbol on a lift and decide that they should not use it (self-discrimination) and hence struggle on a staircase with shopping and the unnecessary risk of tripping/ falling.
Designers, and others who bring designs into realisation, do not deliberately discriminate against users or persons with particular disability, however there is inherent discrimination in the buildings that we create. It is hoped that future generations of designers will become more empathetic to the needs of a wider range of users and therefore help create built environments that can be used and enjoyed by a wide spectrum of users in a natural, unforced, way.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Access consultant.
- Access and inclusion in the built environment: policy and guidance.
- Changing lifestyles.
- Inclusive design.
- Lifting platform.
- The London Plan.
- Wheelchair platform stairlifts.
 External references
- The Lifetime Homes.
- Supplementary Planning Guidance in relation to the Olympic Legacy.
- Supplementary Planning Guidance: Planning for Equality and Diversity in London (2007).
- Supplementary Planning Guidance: Achieving an Inclusive Environment (2004).
- The Equality Act 2010.
- Part M of Building Regulations.
- Approved Document M.
- The Principles of Inclusive Design.
- ODA Inclusive Design Standards (2008).
Featured articles and news
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.
Sir Oliver Letwin to lead an independent review into the delays in the delivery of housing.
As Carillion collapses, read our article explaining insolvency in the construction industry.
43,000 jobs at risk as Carillion declares insolvency.