- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 11 Oct 2020
Liquidation in the construction industry
The term ‘insolvency' describes the inability of a debtor to pay its debts. In the United Kingdom, insolvent individuals are made 'bankrupt', while companies are put into 'liquidation' or 'administration'. In cases of administration, a key objective is to try to ensure the company survives, whereas in liquidation, the company will generally not survive.
Insolvency proceedings are administrative processes instigated by either the insolvent entity or one of their creditors to recover assets so for disposal, the proceeds of which are distributed to creditors.
- Company Voluntary Arrangements.
- Receivership (less common following the enactment of the Enterprise Act 2000).
- Winding up leading to liquidation.
A company can be deemed unable to pay its debts for a number of reasons, including:
- A statutory demand for a debt being served on the company and the company failing to satisfy that debt within three weeks.
- A court judgment against it, where steps to enforce the judgment have been unsuccessful.
- It is proved that the company is unable to pay its debts.
- Its assets are less than its liabilities.
A liquidator is appointed to dispose of the company’s assets to discharge its liabilities to creditors, with any surplus being passed to whomever is entitled to it. Liquidators hold wide powers, constituting the governing body of the company and the receiver of its assets. They are entitled to their own costs before proceeds are distributed to creditors.
 Liquidation of the main contractor
Liquidation is less common that administration in the construction industry. In the case of Carillion in 2018, it is thought that liquidation was chosen as there were insufficient remaining funds to appoint an administrator. Contractually, the consequences are the same, treated simply as 'insolvency'.
- Inactivity, or a lack of materials or plant on site.
- Late payments.
- An increase in the number of disputes, claims and exaggerated claims.
- Requests for advance payment.
- Lack of response to communications.
Most contracts will allow employers to terminate the employment of the contractor in the event of contractor insolvency and to cease payment. Typically, the contract will also allow them to employ others to complete the works and to use plant, tools, equipment, materials, temporary buildings and so on to do so. However, the employer must be certain of the insolvency first, and may seek evidence to confirm the fact.
This still leaves the employer having to find a new contractor and this can be time consuming and expensive, with other prospective contractors knowing that the employer is in a weak negotiating position. They client may also need consent from funding bodies to replace the contractor.
There may also be issues about:
- The ownership of goods, materials and so on that the employer has paid for, but are not in possession of.
- Goods or materials that have been delivered to site but not fixed to the building or paid for (which suppliers may attempt to remove).
- Defects in the works that the contractor has not rectified.
- Latent defects that may not yet be apparent.
- Outstanding payments.
- Overpayment for work that has not been completed.
- Advance payments.
- Outstanding disputes.
The situation is complicated by the prevalence of sub-contracting in the industry. The employer's main contractual link to subcontractors is through the contractor, and this link is been broken by the insolvency. The employer may be protected to some extent by provisions such as collateral warranties and step in rights.
However, the complexity and extent of the supply chain means that the knock on effects of main contractor insolvency can be far reaching. This is exacerbated by the fact that late payment is rife, and so companies in the supply chain of the insolvent company might be owed very large sums of money that they may be unable to continue without.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Advance payment bond.
- Collateral warranties.
- Government procurement post-Carillion.
- Off site goods and materials.
- Off-site goods and materials - legal issues.
- Parent company guarantees.
- Performance bonds.
- Project bank accounts.
- Retention of title.
- Step in rights.
- Vesting certificate.
Featured articles and news
ECA proposes strategies for the present and the future.
Paul Morrell to lead independent review of the construction products testing regime.
Standard will help employers foster wellbeing and manage psychosocial risks.
Global fire standards for safety of people and property.
An introduction to the 5 core principles of lean.
Can the profession use its skills to save the world from climate change?
How faulty science resulted in sanitation reform.
Improving facilities, accessibility and overall appearance.
Free download of TG 12/2021 available.
TESP works with The Youth Group to form skill sharing network.
Big tech collaborates on platform for the built environment.
Letter signed by 21 organisations sent to MHCLG.
A look at the Government's strategic approach.
Steps to help reduce the spread of infection inside buildings.
Click the button to subscribe.