Last edited 27 Dec 2020

Main author

Structural-Safety Researcher Website

FC Twente stadium roof collapse

This article addresses how the industry can learn from the fatal consequences of the collapse at the FC Twente Stadium in Holland in 2011.

The main aspects which flow out of the report are:

What went wrong? Simply, the planned sequence of operations necessary to build such a structure was not followed. It would appear that there were a number of reasons.

  1. The erector’s programme of works was severely condensed.
  2. Concurrent activities took place which should have been sequential to ensure stability at all times.
  3. Respective tolerances were not allowed for in the design.
  4. Overly tight programme period allowed no float to rectify the lack of fit.
  5. Members were installed in a manner that induced stresses above working stresses.
  6. Members critical for temporary and permanent stability were not installed in sequence.
  7. The structure was loaded in its temporary condition prior to completion of necessary stability members. Materials were loaded on the structure in a way that produced a temporary condition more onerous than the permanent condition.

It appears that overly-tight completion dates were allowed to drive the programme in an unsafe manner. The programme, whilst important, must never over-rule safety. The CDM regulations in the UK place a number of responsibilities onto the client, not least the need to ensure sufficient resources and time are allocated to all steps in the design and construction sequence.

It may seem obvious but a structure made up from a number of components needs to be erected in a logical sequence to ensure there is stability at all times. That is an overriding factor. Stability issues can change as other members get added but there must be a clear understanding of loads, their load paths and stability throughout. Until a portion of structural works is handed over there should be no additional load, apart from its self-weight, applied to it unless agreed in writing with the author of the erection method statement. Loading-out of follow-on tradesmaterial is often a critical load case so one must carefully plan the timing of that load application and its position within the structure. Not only can incorrectly placed material cause local failure, it can also cause structure instability and collapse: in particular, the absence of sufficient counterbalance material will cause a cantilever to overturn.

The appointment of a competent Temporary Works Coordinator and the proper implementation of BS5975:2008 + A1:2011, Code of practice for temporary works procedures and the permissible stress design of falsework, should help lead to an avoidance of such events. One weapon in the temporary works designer’s armoury should be the precedence diagram. This defines activities (and part activities) which cannot start until another is complete. This is more than a mere statement of the construction sequence. It specifies the unique, essential, basis for the temporary works stages and should be put on a drawing and issued to the contractor.

In conclusion:

  • Appoint a Temporary Works Coordinator and assign responsibilities.
  • Leave responsibility and control of risks and hazards with those who are competent and best placed to control them.
  • Do not blur those lines.
  • If B must follow A, then ensure that happens and do not deviate unless advised by the originator that it is safe to do so.
  • Do not work to impossible programmes, no matter what the client wants.
  • Better to be alive and a few days late.
  • One would hope that following the UK CDM regulations would prevent such an occurrence .
  • However, hope should not be part of a safety regime.

This topic paper was published by SCOSS in July 2014. You can see the original paper here.


[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki

Designing Buildings Anywhere

Get the Firefox add-on to access 20,000 definitions direct from any website

Find out more Accept cookies and
don't show me this again