Jumpform v slipform
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Jumpform and slipform are both systems of concrete construction that use a self-climbing formwork to construct multi-storey structures, typically building cores and shafts, as well as chimneys and silos. They are both climb-form systems.
In both cases, formwork into which concrete is poured, climbs vertically up the structure being constructed; sometimes this is from power provided by hydraulic rams and electric motors and can mean that craneage is reduced to a minimum. Both systems feature one or more decks or platforms surrounding the construction for workers to carry out the necessary operations as construction proceeds, such as pouring and monitoring concrete compaction, placing reinforcement and finishing the concrete.
Whether slipform or jumpform, the formwork is supported on the concrete that has already been cast below it, so it does not rely on support from other parts of the building; this allows the shaft or core to progress ahead of the rest of the building works.
However, there are important differences between the two systems in terms of operation, speed and the result achieved.
[edit] Jumpform
Typically, jumpform is used on buildings more than five storeys high, although if a fully-climbing system, it can be applied to 20-storeys and more.
Jumpform is characterised by progression in a series of steps or ‘jumps’, progressing to the next section only after the concrete in the previous one has achieved the necessary strength. For example, after a 2m section has been poured and set, the formwork is ‘jumped’ to pour the next 2m section. The system is particularly suited to situations where the resulting joints between jumps will be concealed at every level e.g by the floors of a building.
Jumpform can be very productive, fast and efficient yet minimise the labour required and craneage costs. There are three main type of jumpform:
- Normal – involves formwork that is lifted off by crane and reattached at the next level above.
- Guided – similar to the normal method above but units remain anchored to the structure during the raising operation by crane. This method can be safer and more controlled.
- Self-climbing – this type of jumpform is raised on rails and so does not require a crane.
There could also be trailing platforms and screens that can be used to help workers apply any required finishing to the concrete or retrieve anchors used on the pour below.
Jumpform systems are highly engineered and so can be quickly and accurately adjusted in all planes. However, they depend on the availability of a skilled workforce on site.
[edit] Slipform
Slipform is a continuous pour system involving a self-climbing formwork that supports itself on the core or shaft being constructed, moving slowly over the concrete as it is cast in a continuous, monolithic pour. It can be used to achieve tapered structures with walls of diminishing thickness and is regarded as being more economical when used for structures over seven storeys high.
Slipform typically has three platforms – a lower platform for concrete finishing; a middle platform at the top level of the concrete being poured, and an upper platform for storing materials.
Normally advancing at a rate of around 300mm per hour, slipform can be regarded as a method of vertical extrusion. This can result in a smooth, continuous concrete finish without any joints, an effect which may be required where the finished structure will be visible e.g bridge pylons or a chimneys. However, slipform may entail higher costs due to the required round-the-clock working until the necessary height of structure has been achieved. Like jumpform, it also requires the availability on site of a small, highly-skilled workforce.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
What they are, how they work and why they are popular in many countries.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.
Biomass harvested in cycles of less than ten years.
An interview with the new CIAT President
Usman Yaqub BSc (Hons) PCIAT MFPWS.
Cost benefit model report of building safety regime in Wales
Proposed policy option costs for design and construction stage of the new building safety regime in Wales.
Do you receive our free biweekly newsletter?
If not you can sign up to receive it in your mailbox here.
























