Counterparty
In simple terms a counterparty is one side of a trade, for example the counterparty to a seller is the buyer. A counter party can be an individual, a business, or an organisation such as even a government, and carries associated counterparty risks, normally financial and associated with the other party not performing or fulfilling their side of a transaction.
In modern financing a counterparty may not actually be known as the counterparty as risk has been mitigated to a clearing firm, central counterparties or a central counterparty clearing house (CCP). These organisations are normally financial institutions that are registered and regulated for the sole purpose of taking on counterparty credit risk between different parties in a transaction. They help facilitate derivatives and equities trading, providing clearing and settlement services for trades in foreign exchange, securities, options, and derivative contracts. As development and construction projects often involve high financial risks both the term counterparty and clearing house are relevant.
Within the European Union there is a Central Counterparties (CCPs) list of institutions who have been authorised to offer services and activities in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR).
When the UK left the European Union, The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EUWA) repealed the European Communities Act 1972 and converted into UK domestic law the existing body of directly applicable EU law. The purpose of the EUWA being to provide a functioning statute book directly after leaving the EU. Specific guidance on these matters in included in the Government The Investment Exchanges, Clearing Houses and Central Securities Depositories (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018. The EUWA gives Ministers powers to make Statutory Instruments (SIs) to prevent, remedy or mitigate any failure of EU law to operate effectively, or any other deficiency in retained EU law, contingency preparations for financial services legislation are referred to as ‘onshoring’.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Breach of contract
- Brexit - the case for infrastructure.
- Collateral warranty.
- Construction contract.
- Contracts for Difference.
- Contract law.
- Contract v tort.
- Contracts under seal v under hand.
- Disputes.
- Letter of intent.
- Overcoming the challenges of Brexit.
- Privity of contract.
- Rights of third parties.
- The SME's updated guide to Brexit.
- What does Brexit mean for construction?
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
National Planning Policy Framework
Understanding the 2026 changes.
ECA's public affairs priorities
Member consultation opens to shape priorities for 2027 to 2030.
Dutyholder responsibilities from 1 July 2026.
Where performance meets practice
The Building Envelope Stage at UKCW Birmingham.
CIAT publishes briefing on planning reforms.
Leaders in Learning for Practice Network
Call for conservation leaders in learning to register interest in new network.
The importance of early engagement
Construction lessons from the Trillium HealthWorks Experience Centre.
Mayors are to be given planning call in powers
Mayors across England will be able to make the most important planning decisions.
The Master Builder: William Butterfield and his times. Book review.
Why construction can't afford to ignore the skills gap.
Building Safety Regulator, 19 August
Gill Kernick appointed Independent Chair of Residents’ Panel.
Connecting knowledge, technology and conservation
Building competence for the future of built heritage.

















