- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 02 Oct 2018
BSRIA response to New Homes Ombudsman
In its report published in June 2018, the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Excellence in the Built Environment (APPGEBE) called on the government to make it mandatory for all housebuilders to belong to an independent ombudsman scheme. But BSRIA’s concerns can be summarised in the phrase 'prevention is better than a cure'.
The report, 'Better redress for homebuyers', says that a New Homes Ombudsman should be 'independent, free to consumers, and provide a quick resolution to disputes' within specified time limits. It also recommends government, warranty providers, housebuilders and consumer groups work together to draw up an industry-wide code of practice which would be used by the New Homes Ombudsman to adjudicate on disputes. This should offer reimbursement and compensation for frustrated home buyers.
“Compulsory membership of a New Homes Ombudsman Scheme is a positive step and we hope it will benefit the construction industry. But the emphasis must be on quality wherein the focus is preventing building snags in the first instance. Indeed, BSRIA hopes that an independent ombudsman scheme isn’t seen as an alternative to averting issues in the first place.
"BSRIA has suggested membership of a Competent Person Scheme which will improve new homes completion quality. The scheme should be independent and have no commercial relationship with any house builders and market shareholders.
"Conviction shown in membership of the ombudsman scheme as mandatory must be extended to the construction workers and their membership of their relevant competent workers’ schemes. It is better to prevent a condition than try to cure it. Effort should always focus on improving the quality of the new homes and addressing the home buyer needs.
"Efficient and transparent rectification and redress processes are a key part of consumer protection, however, we see more benefit in reducing consumer risk before the sale and occupation of the home. We need to ensure that the right problem prevention measures are in place prior to sale to reduce the number of complaints.
This inquiry has again highlighted the confusing landscape consumers face when they seek recompense for defective building, with a raft of warranties, housebuilding codes and complaints procedures. This can take a toll on people’s wellbeing as they wrestle with an almost Kafkaesque system. BSRIA has previously made the point that a complicated, consumer-hostile, legal landscape is not helpful to a householder.
This article was originally published by BSRIA in June 2018.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
The admissibility of evidence.
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?
ECA backs call for a rolling programme of rail electrification.
What does 'curtilage' mean and why does it matter?
Our duty to prevent harm and protect each other.
A quality perspective.
If buildings were people, they would be just starting to walk on two legs.
Air filtration and clean air standards.
The Dukes of Normandy and the second world war.