Right to manage for leaseholders
The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 introduced the ability for leaseholders to transfer the management of flats from the landlord to a Right To Manage (RTM) Company, set up by the leaseholders. The ownership of the building remains with the landlord.
For leaseholders to take over management of their property, the property must have the following qualifying features:
- Only flats (not houses) qualify.
- At least two-thirds of the flats in the building must be leasehold with a lease of at least 21 years when granted.
- The building must be predominantly (at least 75%) residential.
- If there are less than four flats in the block, the landlord must live elsewhere unless the flats are purpose-built, rather than conversions.
- At least half of the flats in the building must become members of the right to manage company.
It is not necessary for leaseholders to obtain the landlord’s permission in order to transfer the management and it is not necessary for there to have been any problems with the way the property was managed by the landlord. To exercise the right to manage, a formal notice needs to be served on the landlord. The management will then transfer to the right to manage company. The landlord is eligible to become a member of the right to manage company.
It is possible for the landlord to dispute the application by serving a counter-notice to the right to manage company. This must outline the details of why the landlord does not think the company is entitled to management. This can include:
- The building does not qualify.
- The right to manage company is not legally compliant.
- The right to manage company is comprises less than half the flats in the building.
The right to manage company can apply to the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal within 2 months of the counter-notice and the tribunal will then decide if the company can manage the building. The right to manage company will be responsible for:
- Collecting and managing the service charge.
- Maintenance of the communal areas including hallways and stairwells.
- Upkeep of the actual building, for example the roof.
- Managing complaints about the property.
- Decision-making for budgets
- Standards of management
- The overall functioning of the building.
It is not possible for the right to manage company to stop maintaining the building as a way of saving money.
It is important to note that under the Building Safety Act 2022, Right To Manage Companies (RTMs) and Resident Management Companies (RMCs) have building safety responsibilities, as they are considered accountable persons (APs) and potentially principal accountable persons (PAPs) with legal obligations to repair any common parts of the building. Relevant, especially where a building is higher risk (18 meters in height or seven stories and with at least two residential units).
It is the organisation itself that is accountable for building safety, not the individual shareholders or members; however, the directors of the company are APs, responsible and, in certain circumstances, may be held jointly and personally liable. As it is unlikely that any of the company directors have expertise in the area of building safety, it is probable that they will seek professional support and advice and appoint a PAP. Not seeking the support of a competent person, not doing anything, or doing it themselves when the expertise clearly doesn't exist in the organisation could be considered as negligence and lead to prosecution.
The requirements of all PAPs under the Building Safety Act include:
- Storage and maintenance of building information: How it was designed and built, how it may have changed, and how it is maintained and managed. With information on all aspects of fire and structural safety, evacuation, complaints, and incidents, including documents, drawings, reports, and other records. The ‘Golden Thread’ of information, or the ‘Safety Case.’.
- Safety Case Reporting: Preparation of a ‘safety case report’ for their building, which identifies building safety risks (the risk of fire spread in the building and structural failure) and describes how they are being managed. The safety case report summarises the building safety information, or ‘safety case,’ for the high-rise residential building and shows the PAP is taking all reasonable steps to manage identified building safety risks.
- Engaging with residents: PAPs should engage with residents about safety issues. They must prepare a residents engagement strategy whereby residents and owners of residential units in the building can participate in making building safety decisions. This will provide residents with access to more information about the safety of their building, help them to know what changes are being made to their building, how they are consulted on the changes, and how it will impact them. It will also provide effective routes for resolution.
For further information on related topics follow these links Resident Management Companies (RMCs) in high-rise buildings, The role and responsibilities of accountable persons and principal accountable persons, Becoming a director or member of a residents’ management company, and Guidance About flat management companies, RTM companies and commonhold associations
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Break clauses in leases.
- Building Safety Index
- Commonhold.
- Community right to bid.
- Community right to build.
- Community right to challenge.
- Community right to reclaim land.
- Flat definition.
- Freehold.
- Lease Negotiations - Tenants Checklist.
- Leasehold.
- Leasehold enfranchisement.
- Localism act.
- Rent review.
- Rent-free period.
- Resident Management Companies RMC.
- Right to build.
- Right to contest.
[edit] External references
Featured articles and news
Boiler Upgrade Scheme and certifications consultation
Summary of government consultation which closes 11 June 2025.
Deputy editor of AT, Tim Fraser, discusses the newly formed society with its current chair, Chris Halligan MCIAT.
Barratt Lo-E passivhaus standard homes planned enmasse
With an initial 728 Lo-E homes across two sites and many more planned for the future.
Government urged to uphold Warm Homes commitment
ECA and industry bodies write to Government concerning its 13.2 billion Warm Homes manifesto commitment.
Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1929-1990. Book review.
The emancipation of women in art.
CIOB Construction Manager of the Year 2025
Just one of the winners at the CIOB Awards 2025.
Call for independent National Grenfell oversight mechanism
MHCLG share findings of Building Safety Inquiry in letter to Secretary of State and Minister for Building Safety.
The Architectural Technology Awards
AT Awards now open for this the sixth decade of CIAT.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson awards
Deadline for submissions Friday 30 May 2025.
The benefits of precast, off-site foundation systems
Top ten benefits of this notable innovation.
Encouraging individuals to take action saving water at home, work, and in their communities.
Takes a community to support mental health and wellbeing
The why of becoming a Mental Health Instructor explained.
Mental health awareness week 13-18 May
The theme is communities, they can provide a sense of belonging, safety, support in hard times, and a sense purpose.
Mental health support on the rise but workers still struggling
CIOB Understanding Mental Health in the Built Environment 2025 shows.
Design and construction material libraries
Material, sample, product or detail libraries a key component of any architectural design practice.
Construction Products Reform Green Paper and Consultation
Still time to respond as consultation closes on 21 May 2025.
Resilient façade systems for smog reduction in Shanghai
A technical approach using computer simulation and analysis of solar radiation, wind patterns, and ventilation.