Last edited 25 Oct 2014

Responsibility for building design

This article needs more work. To help develop this article, click 'Edit this article' above. See also Design Liability.


[edit] Design duties in law

[edit] Standard of liability

[edit] Duration of liability

[edit] Techniques and materials


[edit] Compliance with statutory requirements

[edit] Legal responsibility for design

[edit] Architect

  • The overall responsibility for the design of the project will usually be borne by the architect if there is one.
  • An architect who lacks the ability or expertise to carry out part of a design job has three choices:
  1. To refuse the commission altogether.
  2. To persuade the employer to employ a specialist for that part of the work.
  3. To employ and pay for a specialist personally, knowing that any liability for defective design can then be passed along the chain of contracts.
  • The complexity of construction technology has meant that the employer frequently gives the architect the authority to delegate specified parts of the design and it may even be implied from the circumstances of the case.
  • In recommending the appointment of a particular specialist, architects owe their clients the usual duty to use reasonable skill and care.
  • They will not automatically be responsible for the defaults of the people they recommend but if their recommendations are negligent they may become liable for their clients’ losses.
  • When appointing a specialist, the architect’s responsibility will normally be confined to directing and co-ordinating the expert’s work.
  • However, if a problem arises the architect is not entitled to rely blindly on the expert on matters which should have been apparent to him, but must warn the client.

[edit] Contractor

  1. The decision about the required performance.
  2. The way in which the performance will be achieved.

[edit] Sub-contractor