Project crashing is a process that can be used in the management of construction works when the programme is running behind schedule.
Project crashing can be necessary when:
- The programme planning has been inaccurate.
- When there have been unforeseen events which have caused delays, such as defects being discovered.
- Or if the client has requested that the project, or a section of the project, is completed earlier than previously specified, for example if there has been an extension of time, but the client still wishes to achieve the original completion date (this is generally referred to as acceleration).
The aim of crashing is to achieve the maximum decrease in schedule for minimum additional cost. This can be done by:
- Addressing productivity issues being experienced by the current resources and trying to find ways of increasing their efficiency.
- Increase the assignment of resources on critical path activities. These could be internal resources or subcontracted recources.
- Adopting different techniques. This might include off-site prefabrication, extra scaffolding, temporary weatherproofing and so on.
- Overlapping activities.
- Working longer hours.
- Additional supervision.
- Changes to design or specification (for example standardisation replacing bespoke solutions)
- Reduction in scope (for example transferring work to a separate post-contract agreement for occupational works).
- Making early appointments.
- Early procurement of items.
Many of these strategies will necessarily lead to some additional costs being incurred, or cost uncertainty. Whilst the same number of tasks need to be performed, they are condensed into a shorter period, and so are likely to require more resources. In addition, purchasing costs may be higher due to time pressures, incomplete information and the complexity of managing the interfaces between elements. A greater number of variations are also likely than on a traditional contract.
There are several risks attached to project crashing. While resources are typically focused on critical path activities, there is the possibility that non-critical paths will also be affected. Quality, safety and compliance should not be affected as a result of the critical path being crashed. Another risk is that new resources may not be as productive as existing resources, because they may be unfamiliar with the project, the programme and the tasks at hand.
This may require that the size of the contingency is increased.
Project crashing should be resisted if:
- It threatens the integrity of the works, or compromises health and safety.
- It is no longer cost effective to continue.
- It causes another path to become critical.
- Time reduction is no longer realistically achievable.
An alternative to project crashing is fast-track construction, which is a scheduling technique that can be used to compress the overall project schedule. Typically this is decided at the beginning of a project, organising it so that the design and construction phases overlap. This means that that activities normally performed sequential are rescheduled to be performed in parallel or partially in parallel. This will reduce the overall programme, but is likely to increase costs and risks.
For more information, see Fast track construction.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Contractor’s master programme.
- Critical path method.
- Design web.
- Fast track construction.
- Gantt chart.
- Key performance indicators.
- Lead times.
- Programme float.
- Project manager.
- Project programme.
- Scheduling construction activities.
 External resources
- Bright Hub PM - Project crashing
Featured articles and news
A quick introductory article about preliminaries in construction.
Brandenburg Gate - an historic structure that went from symbolising German partition to European unity.
A discussion between construction key players and leading insurers on the future outlook for construction insurance.
New guide from BSRIA on building performance evaluation in domestic buildings.
Rogers Stirk Harbour and Partners complete new trio of towers at Sydney Harbour.
With a new government consultation underway, ICE look at creating a smarter, more flexible energy system.
International Ethics Standards Coalition publishes first set of ethics principles for built environment professionals.
British Antarctic Survey announces research station is to relocate 23km due to growing crack in the ice shelf.
A great example of mimetic architecture with the Fish Building of India.
Could e-bikes be a solution to congested and polluted urban centres?
Government publishes details of £500bn investment pipeline in infrastructure, described as the 'most comprehensive ever'.