- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 12 Aug 2019
Acceleration of construction works
Generally, it is the client that requires the acceleration of construction work. A client might require that a building is handed over earlier than is set out in the contract or, where the contractor has been allowed an extension of time, may require completion earlier than the revised completion date. This is referred to as 'directed acceleration'.
Where the contractor incurs additional costs as a result of this sort of acceleration, it can result in a claim against the client. Typically, the contractor does not have to prove the works were actually completed more quickly than originally agreed, just that they made a reasonable attempt to do so and that the attempt resulted in additional costs.
Acceleration of the works may also be undertaken by the contractor voluntarily, if, for example, they wish to move on to another project, mitigate inefficiencies and delays that may have been incurred, or to save on costs. They may also be motivated by bonuses awarded for early completion. However, if acceleration is undertaken voluntarily, the contractor will not be able to claim additional costs from the client.
There are several techniques available for accelerating work:
- Working overtime.
- Adding new shifts.
- Providing additional labour.
- Additional supervision.
- Providing additional resources, such as plant and equipment.
- Re-sequencing work activities (also known as project crashing or fast tracking).
- Adopting alternative construction methods, such as off-site manufacturing.
- Changing the design or specification.
- Reducing the scope of the works (for example transferring responsibility for some works from the contractor to the client), and
- Early procurement of key items.
These techniques are likely to result in additional costs and may not guarantee early completion. While the same number of tasks need to be performed, they are condensed into a shorter period, and so are likely to require more resources. In addition, purchasing costs may be higher due to time pressures, incomplete information and the complexity of managing the interfaces between elements. A greater number of variations are also likely than on a traditional contract.
Acceleration is also likely to result in additional risks. If resources are focused on critical-path activities, there is the possibility that non-critical-path activities will be affected. Quality, safety and compliance can be affected, and acceleration can result in an overall loss of productivity, perhaps due to tiredness on the part of workers being required to do overtime, or unfamiliarity of the site and the project on the part of additional workers being brought in.
For more information, see Agreement for the acceleration of construction works.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Activity schedule.
- Agreement for the acceleration of construction works.
- Critical path method.
- Extension of time EOT.
- Fast track construction.
- How to prepare a claim for an extension of time.
- Project benchmarking.
- Project crashing.
- Resource leveling.
- Resource management.
- Scheduling construction activities.
- Time-location chart.
- Time management of construction projects.
Featured articles and news
Highlighting the health benefits of home improvement.
Pavilions for music, entertainment, and leisure. Book review.
Broadening our understanding of Dublin’s chequered social history.
The charm of London's Cabmen's shelters.
Future Weather Files research tool looking for feedback.
Exploring the Colour Rendering Index.
Why it's important to find out what went wrong.
ECA reviews the shape of the construction job market.
Why proper room acoustics make a difference.
Initiative puts gas networks on the path to net zero.
WICE Woman Architectural Technologist of the Year 2019.
Traditional low-energy approaches to comfort.
Revisiting the McArthurGlen Designer Outlet in Ashford.
USA In-Use Version 6 is now available.
The rise of architectural barbarism.
In contentious political contexts heritage can be more fractious.
Civil engineering and the digital transformation.