- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 07 Dec 2017
Acceleration of construction works
Generally, it is the client that requires the acceleration of construction work. A client might require that a building is handed over earlier than is set out in the contract or, where the contractor has been allowed an extensions of time, may require completion earlier than the revised completion date. This is referred to as 'directed acceleration'.
Where the contractor incurs additional costs as a result of this sort of acceleration, it can result in a claims against the client. Typically, the contractor does not have to prove the works were actually completed more quickly than originally agreed, just that they made a reasonable attempt to do so and that the attempt resulted in additional costs.
Acceleration of the works may also be undertaken by the contractor voluntarily, if, for example, they wish to; move on to another project, mitigate inefficiencies and delays that may have been incurred, or to save on costs. They may also be motivated by bonuses awarded for early completion. However, if acceleration is undertaken voluntarily, the contractor will not be able to claim additional costs from the client.
There are several techniques available for accelerating work:
- Working overtime.
- Adding new shifts.
- Providing additional labour.
- Additional supervision.
- Providing additional resources, such as plant and equipment.
- Re-sequencing work activities (also known as project crashing or fast tracking).
- Adopting alternative construction methods, such as off site manufacturing.
- Changing the design or specification.
- Reducing the scope of the works (for example transferring responsibility for some works from the contractor to the client).
- Early procurement of key items.
These techniques are likely to result in additional costs and may not guarantee early completion. Whilst the same number of tasks need to be performed, they are condensed into a shorter period, and so are likely to require more resources. In addition, purchasing costs may be higher due to time pressures, incomplete information and the complexity of managing the interfaces between elements. A greater number of variations are also likely than on a traditional contract.
Options such as working overtime typically result in employees being paid at a higher rate (typically 1.5-2 times the regular rate).
Acceleration is also likely to result in additional risks. If resources are focused on critical path activities, there is the possibility that non-critical path activities will be affected. Quality, safety and compliance can be affected, and acceleration can result in an overall loss of productivity, perhaps due to tiredness on the part of workers being required to do overtime, or unfamiliarity of the site and the project on the part of additional workers being brought in.
For more information, see Agreement for the acceleration of construction works.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Activity schedule.
- Agreement for the acceleration of construction works.
- Critical path method.
- Extension of time EOT.
- Fast track construction.
- How to prepare a claim for an extension of time.
- Project benchmarking.
- Project crashing.
- Resource leveling.
- Resource management.
- Scheduling construction activities.
- Time-location chart.
- Time management of construction projects.
Featured articles and news
From alabaster to travertine – how many types do you know?
Well-designed lighting helps maintain a healthy physiological and psychological balance.
Transferring the risk for obtaining the target BREEAM rating.
A simple but effective way to determine the root cause of an issue.
BSRIA report suggest the European market will double to 415 million Euros by 2023.
Why a wellbeing strategy is vital for property managers.
An ECA briefing for members about the commercial implications of leaving the EU.
A crucial moment on any project - and fraught with danger.
The performance gap from a Northern Ireland perspective.
Book review: Buildings of protestant nonconformity.
Design and testing for health and wellbeing - free download from BRE.