- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 13 Oct 2015
Never Waste A Good Crisis - A Challenge To The UK Construction Industry
'Never Waste A Good Crisis - A Challenge To The UK Construction Industry’ was written by by Andrew Wolstenholme of Balfour Beatty Management for Constructing Excellence and published in October 2009.
Constructing Excellence (CE) describes itself as ‘…the single organisation charged with driving the change agenda in construction. We exist to improve industry performance in order to produce a better built environment. We are a cross-sector, cross-supply chain, member led organisation operating for the good of industry and its stakeholders.’ It was one of a number of cross-industry bodies established to drive change in response to the Latham Report (Constructing the Team 1994) and the Egan Report (Rethinking Construction 1998) which concluded that ‘the industry as a whole is under-achieving’, and called for dramatic improvements.
'Never Waste A Good Crisis', written during the worst depths of the credit crunch was intended to assess the progress that the industry has made since Rethinking Construction in 1998 and to set out a series of further improvements that could be made over the next ten years.
Rethinking Construction had proposed:
- Integrated project processes.
- Decent and safe working conditions.
- Improved management and supervisory skills.
- Replacing competitive tendering with long-term relationships.
- That leading public sector bodies should become best practice clients.
- Annual reductions of 10% in construction costs and construction time and a reduction in defects of 20% per year.
In September 2002 the Strategic Forum for Construction published a report on its first year of activity Accelerating change: A report by the Strategic Forum for Construction, chaired by Sir John Egan. In it, Egan stated 'I have been greatly impressed by the industry's efforts to apply 'Rethinking Construction' principles'.
In 2002, the Rethinking Construction Group Ltd, chaired by Alan Crane, published Rethinking Construction 2002: Achievements, Next Steps, Getting Involved. The report offered a further update on progress as well as outlining a strategy for the following two years stating, ‘...it is quite incredible to see how much progress we have already made in implementing the recommendations for radical change set out in Sir John Egan’s Rethinking Construction.'
However, in May 2008, Sir John Egan stated that ‘we have to say we’ve got pretty patchy results. And certainly nowhere near the improvement we could have achieved, or that I expected to achieve…..I guess if I were giving marks out of 10 after 10 years I’d probably only give the industry about four out of 10’ ref Egan: I’d give construction about 4 of 10.
Similarly, Never Waste A Good Crisis found that there was still a long way to go and that simply hoping the industry would improve as the economy recovered would miss a great opportunity, with Egan stating in the Foreword to the report, ‘Since 1998 we could have had a revolution and what we've achieved so far is a bit of improvement.’
Wolstenholme concluded that ‘Few of the Egan targets has been met in full, while most have fallen considerably short. Where improvement has been achieved, too often the commitment to Egan's principles has been skin-deep. In some sectors, such as housing, construction simply does not matter, because there is such limited understanding of how value can be created through the construction process.’
The report found that whilst there was a better understanding of value, quality and whole-life costing, and more widespread adoption of collaborative practices, there was a tendency to only adopt best practice on flagship projects. There was less uptake amongst the wider industry and little evidence of practices filtering down through the supply chain. It was found that less than half of the respondents to a CE survey believed the projects they worked were completed to time and to budget.
The report identified blocks to change, including ‘business models based on short term cycles, a fragmented industry, poor integration in the supply chain, and a lack of strategic commitment at senior management and Government levels’.
It suggested that a better understanding of value was still needed and that clients had to move away from just considering building cost, and putting downward pressure on the relatively small costs of design. It stated that ‘we believe that the era of client-led change is over, at least for the moment, and that it is now time for the supply side to demonstrate how it can create additional economic social and environmental value through innovation, collaboration and integrated working.’
It recommended better training across the industry and that industry bodies and professional associations should collaborate to represent the industry more effectively.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Accelerating change: A report by the Strategic Forum for Construction.
- Construction 2025.
- Constructing Excellence.
- Construction Industry Statistics.
- Government Construction Strategy.
- Latham report.
- Lean construction.
- List of construction industry reports since 1934.
- Rethinking Construction 2002: Achievements, Next Steps, Getting Involved.
 External references
- Constructing Excellence, Never Waste A Good Crisis - A Challenge To The UK Construction Industry.
Featured articles and news
What is biophilic design and how can it increase wellbeing?
80 experts come up with the top 7 mistakes the industry makes with BREEAM.
Compliance cannot be verified by inspection on delivery.
Some electric cars have batteries that give a range of over 350 miles.
Assembling, curating, caring for, and designing the future.
A sensitive approach to renovating a building of historic stature.
UK energy policy uncertainty as Welsh project put on hold
What collaborative working achieves and how it can be put in place.
BSRIA publishes the 2019 edition of its small but concise annual databook.
Using QSAND to measure the performance of disaster response.
What U-values are, why they matter and how they are calculated.
The need to ensure that we plan for all aspects of our bio-economy
BSRIA calls on government to reach deeper into the causes of pollution.