- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 22 Dec 2019
Limit state design
A degree of loading or other actions imposed on a structure can result in a ‘limit state’, where the structure’s condition no longer fulfils its design criteria, such as; fitness for use, structural integrity, durability, and so on. Limit states are conditions of potential failure.
LSD involves estimating the subjected loads on a structure, choosing the sizes of members to check, and selecting the appropriate design criteria. LSD requires two principal criteria to be satisfied: the ultimate limit state (ULS) and the serviceability limit state (SLS).
 Ultimate limit state (ULS)
The ultimate limit state is the design for the safety of a structure and its users by limiting the stress that materials experience. In order to comply with engineering demands for strength and stability under design loads, ULS must be fulfilled as an established condition.
The ULS is a purely elastic condition, usually located at the upper part of its elastic zone (approximately 15% lower than the elastic limit). This is in contrast to the ultimate state (US) which involves excessive deformations approaching structural collapse, and is located deeply within the plastic zone.
If all factored bending, shear and tensile or compressive stresses are below the calculated resistances then a structure will satisfy the ULS criterion. Safety and reliability can be assumed as long as this criterion is fulfilled, since the structure will behave in the same way under repetitive loadings.
BS EN 1990 Eurocode – 'Basis of structural design' describes four ultimate limit states:
- EQU: Loss of static equilibrium of the structure.
- STR: Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure.
- GEO: Failure or excessive deformation of the ground.
- FAT: Fatigue failure of the structure.
 Serviceability limit state (SLS)
The servicability limit state is the design to ensure a structure is comfortable and useable. This includes vibrations and deflections (movements), as well as cracking and durability. These are the conditions that are not strength-based but still may render the structure unsuitable for its intended use, for example, it may cause occupant discomfort under routine conditions.
SLS requirements tend to be less rigid than strength-based limit states as the safety of the structure is not in question. A structure must remain functional for its intended use subject to routine loading in order to satisfy SLS criterion.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Adaptive structures.
- Anticlastic structures.
- Biaxial bending.
- Braced frame.
- Building science.
- Concept structural design of buildings.
- Defects in construction.
- Lateral loads.
- Material utilisation (MUT).
- Shear force.
- Structural engineer.
- Structural steelwork.
- Structural vibration.
- Types of structural load.
 External resources
Featured articles and news
Five signs you are at risk.
Biotechnology as it applies to the built environment.
Stopping sound coming through windows.
Government response to the Building a Safer Future consultation.
Energy savings quickly payback any small additional capital investment.
Overbuild and air-space developments.
Airports National Policy Statement and its impact on infrastructure.
Organisations will collaborate on infrastructure initiatives.
Technology informs procurement and planning practices.
BSRIA releases market sector growth projections.
Designing for durability and resilience.