Extended aftercare for completed construction works
The soft landings framework is a joint initiative between BSRIA (Building Services Research and Information Association) and UBT (Usable Buildings Trust). It is an open-source framework intended to ‘…smooth the transition into use and to address problems that post-occupancy evaluations (POEs) show to be widespread’ (ref Useable Buildings Trust).
The government considers that soft landings sits alongside Building Information Modelling (BIM), as BIM feeds facility management systems and helps enable future alterations to completed buildings. As a result, it is thought that, in parallel to the roll out of BIM, the government may mandate a Government Soft Landings (GSL) handover protocol for central government projects by 2016.
Soft landings includes provisions for initial aftercare and extended aftercare services for three years after the completed development has been handed over to the occupants. A decision to require this aftercare should be made early during the development of the project so that the necessary services can be included in tender documents and appointment agreements.
The Initial aftercare period is intended to deal with immediate problems, help the occupants understand the development, and help facilities managers learn to operate it. It is a period of intensive aftercare that will typically last 4 to 6 weeks.
After this, the aftercare on site will reduce over a period of 3 years. During this extended aftercare, review meetings will continue to be held, newsletters issued, and walkabouts undertaken but they will become less frequent as time progresses.
In year 1, outstanding problems are identified and resolved, continued training provided and systems fine-tuned, with regular reviews of performance, and comparisons with design predictions.
In years 2 and 3, performance is reviewed less frequently.
Post occupancy surveys should be carried out during year 2, ideally by independent organisations. These do not happen sooner, as the building will not yet have gone through a full year of operation, and so surveys could not properly account for different seasons or patterns of usage. In addition, if they were carried out sooner, surveys might be pre-occupied with teething problems rather than the underlying performance of the development. A second survey may be undertaken in year 3 to obtain additional feedback about the long-term performance of the development.
During this period, the facilities management team should log energy usage, and prepare regular written reviews of performance. Any fine tuning or other changes should also be recorded. Data and other evidence obtained during this period can help inform decisions about future alterations to the development.
A lessons learned report might be prepared at end of year 3.
This process of extended aftercare not only helps to inform users and facilities managers, it also provides the opportunity for the project team to learn about problems that have been encountered, assess what steps might be taken to rectify them and consider how to avoid them on future projects.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- BIM and facilities management.
- BREEAM Aftercare support.
- Building information modelling.
- Building log book.
- Building owner's manual.
- Building users guide.
- Building performance metrics.
- Client commissioning.
- Defects liability period.
- Government construction strategy.
- Handover to client.
- Initial aftercare
- Lessons learned report.
- Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology soft landings project.
- Migration strategy.
- Occupation of completed construction site.
- Post occupancy evaluation.
- Post project review.
- Performance in use.
- Snagging.
- Soft landings.
- Soft Landings for owners.
- Technical guide.
Featured articles and news
Buildings that changed the future of architecture. Book review.
The Sustainability Pathfinder© Handbook
Built environment agency launches free Pathfinder© tool to help businesses progress sustainability strategies.
Government outcome to the late payment consultation, ECA reacts.
IHBC 2025 Gus Astley Student Award winners
Work on the role of hewing in UK historic conservation a win for Jack Parker of Oxford Brookes University.
Future Homes Building Standards and plug-in solar
Parts F and L amendments, the availability of solar panels and industry responses.
How later living housing can help solve the housing crisis
Unlocking homes, unlocking lives.
Preparing safety case reports for HRBs under the BSA
A new practical guide to preparing structural inputs for safety cases and safety case reports published by IStructE.
Male construction workers and prostate cancer
CIOB and Prostate Cancer UK encourage awareness of prostate cancer risks, and what to do about it.
The changed R&D tax landscape for Architects
Specialist gives a recap on tax changes for Research and Development, via the ACA newsletter.
Structured product data as a competitive advantage
NBS explain why accessible product data that works across digital systems is key.
Welsh retrofit workforce assessment
Welsh Government report confirms Wales faces major electrical skills shortage, warns ECA.
A now architectural practice looks back at its concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement 25 years on.
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
Government report and back track on copyright opt out for AI training but no clear preferred alternative as yet.
Embedding AI tools into architectural education
Beyond the render: LMU share how student led research is shaping the future of visualisation workflows.
Why document control still fails UK construction projects
A Chartered Quantity Surveyor explains what needs to change and how.
Inspiration for a new 2026 wave of Irish construction professionals.
New planning reforms and Warm Homes Bill
Take centre stage at UK Construction Week London.























