Capping clause
A capping clause is a contractual provision that limits the liability of a party to a contract. It sets a maximum limit, or cap, on the amount that one party can be required to pay to the other in the event of a breach of contract, negligence, or other specified circumstances. This is particularly relevant in construction contracts where the financial implications of potential risks and liabilities can be substantial.
For example, a capping clause might state that the contractor's liability for delays is capped at 10% of the contract value. This means that if the project is delayed due to the contractor's fault, the maximum amount the contractor would be liable to pay in damages would be limited to 10% of the total contract price.
Capping clauses help parties manage and allocate financial risks more effectively. By knowing the maximum potential liability, parties can make informed decisions and arrange appropriate insurance coverage. It provides certainty and predictability regarding financial exposure, which is crucial for budgeting and financial planning, and can be a valuable negotiation tool, allowing parties to agree on acceptable levels of risk and reward.
The clause specifies a maximum monetary amount that one party's liability cannot exceed. This limit can be a fixed sum, a percentage of the contract value, or linked to the insurance cover available.
The clause can define which types of liabilities are subject to the cap. This might include direct losses, indirect losses, consequential damages, or specific types of claims such as those arising from defects or delays. Certain types of liabilities are often excluded from the cap. Common exclusions include liabilities for death or personal injury caused by negligence, fraud, and willful misconduct. These exclusions ensure that the cap does not provide protection in cases of serious wrongdoing.
The clause applies to claims arising under the contract, which may include breaches of contract, tort claims (such as negligence), and statutory liabilities.
The cap should be set at a level that reasonably reflects the potential risks and losses that might arise. If set too low, it may not provide sufficient protection for the non-breaching party. Parties often align the cap with the insurance coverage available. It is important to ensure that the cap is consistent with the terms and limits of the relevant insurance policies.
Capping clauses can be mutual, applying to both parties, or unilateral, applying to one party only. The fairness and balance of the clause should be considered during negotiations.
The enforceability of capping clauses can depend on the specific wording and the context in which they are used. Courts may scrutinize these clauses, particularly if they appear to be overly restrictive or unreasonable.
It is essential to carefully draft and negotiate these clauses to ensure they are fair, reasonable, and adequately protect the interests of all parties involved.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Agreement.
- Clause.
- Collateral warranty.
- Construction contract.
- Construction contract conditions.
- Contract administrator.
- Contract negotiations.
- Essentials of a contract.
- Guaranteed maximum price.
- Implied terms.
- Modifying clauses in standard forms of contract.
- Professional indemnity insurance clause in conditions of engagement.
- Standard form of contract.
- The Chancery Lane Project.
- Z clauses.
Featured articles and news
Skills gap and investment returns on apprenticeships
ECA welcomes new reports from JTL Training and The Electrotechnical Skills Partnership.
Committee report criticises UK retrofit schemes
CIOB responds to UK’s Energy Security and Net Zero Committee report.
Design and construction industry podcasts
Professional development, practice, the pandemic, platforms and podcasts. Have we missed anything?
C20 Society; Buildings at Risk List 2025
10 more buildings published with updates on the past decade of buildings featured.
Boiler Upgrade Scheme and certifications consultation
Summary of government consultation, closing 11 June 2025.
Deputy editor of AT, Tim Fraser, discusses the newly formed society with its current chair, Chris Halligan MCIAT.
Barratt Lo-E passivhaus standard homes planned enmasse
With an initial 728 Lo-E homes across two sites and many more planned for the future.
Government urged to uphold Warm Homes commitment
ECA and industry bodies write to Government concerning its 13.2 billion Warm Homes manifesto commitment.
From project managers to rising stars, sustainability pioneers and more.
Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1929-1990. Book review.
The emancipation of women in art.
Call for independent National Grenfell oversight mechanism
MHCLG share findings of Building Safety Inquiry in letter to Secretary of State and Minister for Building Safety.
The Architectural Technology Awards
AT Awards now open for this the sixth decade of CIAT.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson awards
Deadline for submissions Friday 30 May 2025.
The benefits of precast, off-site foundation systems
Top ten benefits of this notable innovation.
Encouraging individuals to take action saving water at home, work, and in their communities.
Takes a community to support mental health and wellbeing
The why of becoming a Mental Health Instructor explained.