Bid security
Bid security is a critical aspect of the tendering process in the construction industry, serving as a financial assurance that contractors will honour their commitments if awarded a contract. It plays a pivotal role in ensuring the integrity and reliability of the bidding process, protecting clients or project owners from the risks associated with contractors withdrawing their bids or failing to execute the contract.
In the competitive environment of the construction industry, the tendering process is designed to select the most suitable contractor for a project based on factors such as cost, experience, and technical capability. However, this process is not without risks. Contractors may submit bids that, for various reasons, they later decide not to honour. This could be due to financial difficulties, better opportunities elsewhere, or a miscalculation in their bid. To mitigate these risks, clients often require contractors to provide bid security as part of their tender submission.
Bid security typically takes the form of a bid bond or a bank guarantee. A bid bond is a type of surety bond provided by a financial institution, usually an insurance company or a bank, which guarantees that the contractor will enter into the contract and provide the necessary performance and payment bonds if their bid is accepted. The value of the bid bond is usually a percentage of the bid amount, commonly ranging from 1% to 5%. This financial guarantee ensures that the client will be compensated if the contractor fails to proceed with the contract after being awarded the project.
The inclusion of bid security in the tendering process acts as a deterrent against frivolous or non-committal bidding. Contractors are less likely to submit a bid unless they are serious about the project and confident in their ability to fulfil the contract. This helps to ensure that only genuine and capable contractors participate in the tendering process, reducing the likelihood of project delays or disruptions.
Bid security provides financial protection for the client. In the event that a contractor reneges on their bid, the client can claim the bid security to cover the costs of re-tendering the project or the difference between the original contractor’s bid and the next lowest bid. This financial safety net is particularly important in large-scale construction projects, where delays and additional costs can have significant financial implications.
It also helps to build trust between clients and contractors, fostering long-term professional relationships and encouraging more competitive and fair bidding practices.
However, while bid security offers significant benefits, it also presents challenges for contractors. The requirement to provide bid security can be a financial burden, particularly for smaller contractors who may struggle to secure the necessary bonds or guarantees. The cost of obtaining bid bonds, combined with the potential loss of the bond amount in the event of a bid withdrawal, can be substantial. This may discourage smaller firms from participating in tenders, potentially limiting competition and innovation.
Furthermore, the process of securing bid bonds can be complex and time-consuming. Contractors must undergo a thorough evaluation by the issuing institution, which assesses their financial stability, track record, and ability to perform the contract. This process can be particularly challenging for new entrants to the market, who may not have an established reputation or financial history. As a result, the requirement for bid security can inadvertently favour larger, more established firms, potentially leading to a concentration of market power.
In response to these challenges, there have been calls within the industry to review and potentially reform the use of bid security. Some stakeholders advocate more flexible approaches, such as reducing the value of bid bonds or allowing alternative forms of security, to make the tendering process more accessible to a wider range of contractors. Others argue for better education and support for smaller contractors in obtaining bid bonds, to ensure that they are not unduly excluded from the market.
See also: Bid bond.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
What they are, how they work and why they are popular in many countries.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.
Biomass harvested in cycles of less than ten years.
An interview with the new CIAT President
Usman Yaqub BSc (Hons) PCIAT MFPWS.
Cost benefit model report of building safety regime in Wales
Proposed policy option costs for design and construction stage of the new building safety regime in Wales.
Do you receive our free biweekly newsletter?
If not you can sign up to receive it in your mailbox here.
























