- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 29 Apr 2019
Public contracting authorities must leave a period of least 10 days between a contract award decision and the formal award of the contract. This is known as the standstill (Alcatel) period. It is a legal requirement for all public contracting authority procurement processes covered by the full scope of the EU Procurement Directives.
The purpose of the standstill is to allow unsuccessful bidders the chance to obtain more information on the award of the contract so they can take appropriate action if they believe they have been unfairly treated.
The term 'Alcatel period' derives from two European cases (C81/98 - Alcatel Austria v Bundeministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr and C212/02 - Commission v Austria) which brought about the change in the law.
 What does it apply to?
The period applies to ‘public contracting authorities’ for the supply of goods, works and services contracts above the threshold value. These thresholds range from around £156,000 for essential local government supplies and services contacts (£101,000 for central government) up to around £3,927,000 for works contracts. Similar regulations apply to utilities companies.
 Beginning of the standstill period
The commencement of the standstill (Alcatel) period is from the date the authority decides to award the contract. At this point, the authority will produce an Alcatel letter indicating the beginning of the standstill. This provides bidders with the opportunity to challenge the award decision before the contracts are signed.
It is usual that if the means of communication is electronic, that the time period will be 10 days. However, if the means is to be non-electronic then this can be either 15 days from the date of sending, or 10 days from the date of receipt.
 Legal background
The 10-day period is usually scheduled as follows:
- Day 0: Notification of award decision through the Alcatel letters.
- Day 2: Deadline for unsuccessful bidders to request an ‘accelerated debrief’. This can be a means of obtaining information that may facilitate a challenge to the award.
- Day 3 to 7: Responses must be made to debriefing requests during this period. Should there be delays in providing the necessary information the standstill period can be extended.
- Day 10: Standstill period ends at midnight.
- Day 11: If no legal challenge is brought forward, the final award of the contract is made.
In 2009, the provision for an accelerated debrief changed, with the necessary details relating to the contract award decision needing to be provided to all unsuccessful bidders without them having to request it by the end of Day 2.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Accelerated debrief.
- Breach of contract.
- Construction contract.
- Contract award.
- Contract conditions.
- Contract documents.
- Contract v tort.
- Contracts under seal v under hand.
- Essentials of a contract.
- Framework contract.
- Government Construction Strategy.
- Letter of award.
- OJEU procurement practices.
- Procurement route.
- Public procurement.
- Social value act.
- Tender documentation.
- Tender processes.
 External references
Featured articles and news
Framework examines social value of projects.
RfX or Request for [fill in the blank].
Organisation establishes Equality, Diversity, Inclusion taskforce.
Government announces plans for new building projects.
Outsourcing method to procure and manage supplies.
Joint support of Local Authority Historic Environment and Conservation Services.
The Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel is an outstanding achievement.
Buildings of the interwar years. Book review.
Ireland’s climate change sectoral adaptation plan.
Rethinking the acoustics of the office.
Various deterrent measures can help managers deal with avian problems.
Groups send message to government.
Mark Beard FCIOB shares thoughts on changes in the construction industry.
The three layers in modern laminates have specific functions.
The CIOB and UK BIM Alliance announce formal affiliation.