A brief commentary on the code for construction product information CCPI
Article extracted from AT Journal Winter 2021 no 140, words by Rob Firman, Technical and Specification Manager, Polyfoam XPS |
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
September 2021 saw publication of the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI), following a consultation process. The Code has been prepared by the Marketing Integrity Group (MIG), an industry body set up by the Construction Products Association (CPA) in response to Dame Judith Hackitt’s report Building A Safer Future.
The Code is aimed at manufacturers of construction products. It sets out eleven clauses that, when the Code is implemented, will need to be met in order for a manufacturer to be deemed code-compliant. The intention is that, by meeting the eleven clauses, a manufacturer is demonstrating their commitment to providing the industry with product information that meets five tests: clear, accurate, up-to-date, accessible and unambiguous.
[edit] Should design professionals be familiar with the CCPI?
At the time of writing, the CCPI has been published including details of the assessment process. Assessors are being recruited, and manufacturers have been invited to express their interest in signing up. That means manufacturers cannot yet claim to be compliant, and design professionals cannot yet choose whether to work only with manufacturers who have the CCPI ‘badge’. The big question is whether the CCPI will make a difference to how you find and use product information.
The Code is being heavily promoted to manufacturers, with suggestions that organisations risk being ‘left behind’ if they do not adopt it. They are also being told that having the Code badge will help them to stand out. If the aim is universal adoption, then design professionals could eventually be in a situation where there is nothing to distinguish between manufacturers – which is not really any different to the situation now, where nobody has a CCPI-style accreditation. In that case, the determining factor will remain your individual experience of interacting with amanufacturer, and whether you feel confidence in them and their product.
At present, we would anticipate the biggest visible difference being that product information – especially in written form – is likely to be presented in a different way. Exactly how different will depend on each individual manufacturer and their current approach to providing information. Will manufacturers need to be accredited in order to do better?
[edit] How are product manufacturers responding to the CCPI proposals?
As soon as the consultation version of the CCPI was published, some manufacturers – including ourselves – used it to begin reviewing internal processes. That review included examining the flow of information through different departments, in addition to reassessing the content of published materials. In that sense, the CCPI has already proved useful. Multiple factors will dictate whether this translates into a formal assessment against the Code, however.
The MIG promised that any necessary changes would be made to the CCPI in response to the consultation, but the published version came out just weeks after the consultation report. Any changes seemed to be minimal and did not seem to address legitimate concerns that were raised at the consultation stage.
According to the consultation report, design professionals who responded to the consultation seemed to be broadly in favour of the CCPI. However, it was interesting to note the number of responses that centred on manufacturers offering specific types of information – especially around sustainability and environmental impact.
The objective of the CCPI is not to make manufacturers provide all of the information that design professionals and specifiers want or will find useful. It is to give reassurance that the information they do provide meets the five criteria set out by the Code.
The consultation suggested there is a demand for information on sustainability that is not currently being met. Wouldn’t manufacturers be better off investing their time and money in providing transparent information to meet that demand, such as in the form of environmental product declarations (EPDs), over pursuing CCPI accreditation?
[edit] Will the CCPI succeed?
There are plenty of examples where ‘having a badge’ is demonstrably a good thing, and designers and specifiers respond to it. There are also examples of schemes and accreditations that, however well intentioned, simply do not resonate with the intended audience.
While there was undoubtedly support for the CCPI during its consultation, it is not clear whether it was mainly from people and organisations who closely followed its progress because they were aware of the Code and already responding to the idea positively. There were also justified questions and concerns which the consultation response and published version arguably have not answered.
Will the CCPI succeed? At this stage it is too early to tell. The real acid test will be acceptance from product information users – including design professionals. For manufacturers to adopt the CCPI badge over the long- term, there will need to be demand for it. In particular, product information users will need to be willing to act on possible breaches, including engaging with the infrastructure that is set up to support monitoring and enforcement.
Polyfoam XPS provides extruded polystyrenesolutions for ground floor and flat roof build-ups. Visit polyfoamxps.co.uk for technical advice and to subscribe to our monthly newsletter, The Build-Up.
--CIAT
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Code for Construction Product Information CCPI
- Considerate Constructors Scheme CCS.
- Construction Products Association CPA.
- Grenfell Tower articles.
- Grenfell Tower fire.
- Hackitt review.
- Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report.
- Post-Grenfell product code combats misleading marketing.
- Product manufacturers must regain confidence.
- Supplier.
- Supply chain.
Featured articles and news
Impact report from the Supply Chain Sustainability School
Free sustainability skills, training and support delivered to thousands of UK companies to help cut carbon.
The Building Safety Forum at the Installershow 2025
With speakers confirmed for 24 June as part of Building Safety Week.
The UK’s largest air pollution campaign.
Future Homes Standard, now includes solar, but what else?
Will the new standard, due to in the Autumn, go far enough in terms of performance ?
BSRIA Briefing: Cleaner Air, Better tomorrow
A look back at issues relating to inside and outside air quality, discussed during the BSRIA briefing in 2023.
Restoring Abbotsford's hothouse
Bringing the writer Walter Scott's garden to life.
Reflections on the spending review with CIAT.
Retired firefighter cycles world to raise Grenfell funds
Leaving on 14 June 2025 Stephen will raise money for youth and schools through the Grenfell Foundation.
Key points for construction at a glance with industry reactions.
Functionality, visibility and sustainability
The simpler approach to specification.
Architects, architecture, buildings, and inspiration in film
The close ties between makers and the movies, with our long list of suggested viewing.
SELECT three-point plan for action issued to MSPs
Call for Scottish regulation, green skills and recognition of electrotechnical industry as part of a manifesto for Scottish Parliamentary elections.
UCEM becomes the University of the Built Environment
Major milestone in its 106-year history, follows recent merger with London School of Architecture (LSE).
Professional practical experience for Architects in training
The long process to transform the nature of education and professional practical experience in the Architecture profession following recent reports.
A people-first approach to retrofit
Moving away from the destructive paradigm of fabric-first.
International Electrician Day, 10 June 2025
Celebrating the role of electrical engineers from André-Marie Amperè, today and for the future.
New guide for clients launched at Houses of Parliament
'There has never been a more important time for clients to step up and ...ask the right questions'
The impact of recycled slate tiles
Innovation across the decades.
EPC changes for existing buildings
Changes and their context as the new RdSAP methodology comes into use from 15 June.