Will government waste the opportunity of the National Infrastructure Assessment?
One year on from the publication of the National Infrastructure Assessment, we await the government’s response. Politicians are at risk of missing the opportunity to tackle Britain’s challenges, writes Chris Richards. |
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The world is changing rapidly. A range of factors that will impact society are converging, including population growth, demographic shifts and rapid urbanisation, but above all else we have the burning platform of a burning planet that urgently needs to be addressed.
Infrastructure has been core to solving societal problems in the past and it remains core today. Investing timely, effectively and efficiently in the right infrastructure has a central role to play in addressing the challenges above, or we risk condemning ourselves and future generations to living in slums while grappling with extreme climate conditions.
[edit] Societal challenges don’t go away if you ignore them, they only get more costly
It was with this in mind that the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) was set up in the UK. It is an independent body tasked with looking ahead across the coming decades to identify the key challenges and opportunities and how infrastructure can be used to address them. Politicians of all stripes would then have a ready body of evidence to use to make their decisions on infrastructure in a timely manner.
History has shown that where decisions on infrastructure are not made, the underlying challenges do not go away, but simply grow in impact and potential cost if not addressed.
Delaying a decision is a decision in itself; a decision to cost the taxpayer more through missed benefits, achieved through more optimised infrastructure networks; and to cost the taxpayer more through higher project costs when solutions have to be accelerated to meet the need.
The Committee on Climate Change in its 2019 Progress Report to Parliament has warned of the impact of delay today, noting that while the government has legislated for a net-zero emissions target, "action to curb greenhouse gas emissions is lagging far behind what is needed, even to meet previous, less stringent, emissions targets".
[edit] One year on from the National Infrastructure Assessment
July 10 marks one year since the NIC’s work, the National Infrastructure Assessment (NIA), was published. A world-beating body of evidence, the NIA set out in detail the key steps needed to address congestion, capacity constraints and carbon emissions across Britain.
However, the true benefit of the NIA is that it is an endowment of solid evidence for the country to start the conversation now, on the best options for the future, to maximise benefits and minimise costs and impact.
The government was supposed to respond within one year to the NIA, however this has been pushed to autumn 2019, given other domestic, political considerations. There is now a risk that the NIA will be wasted.
Despite warm words about infrastructure and the National Infrastructure Commission from both candidates - Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt - vying to be the next prime minister, action once in post will be important. This includes moving swiftly to direct the efforts of government toward responding robustly to the NIA before the end of the year.
While politicians across the spectrum are rightly focussed on how best to deliver the result of the Brexit referendum, they cannot allow Britain’s challenges to slip down the agenda.
Fortunately, in the NIA they have been given a ready set of solutions to some of the knottier, long-term challenges that require decisions today. They should not let that opportunity go to waste.
[edit] About this article
This article was written by ice.org.uk Chris Richards, Head of Policy and Public Affairs at the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). It was previously published in July 2019 on the ICE website and can be accessed here.
Other articles by the ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki can be accessed here.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building our Industrial Strategy: green paper.
- Construction 2025.
- Osborne launches National Infrastructure Commission.
- Government construction strategy.
- Industrial Strategy: building a Britain fit for the future.
- Interim National Infrastructure Assessment, Congestion, Capacity, Carbon.
- National Infrastructure Commission call for evidence.
- National Infrastructure Commission.
- National Infrastructure Plan.
- National Infrastructure Pipeline.
- National Infrastructure Plan for Skills.
- Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
Featured articles and news
Celebrating architecture's eloquent champions.
Unusual perspectives on 1960s’ thinking.
AI and the challenges to intellectual property
The legal landscape of adopting AI now and in the future.
Worrying landscape for Welsh construction SMEs revealed.
In recent risk factor analysis report completed by CIOB.
Construction Sport survey highlights risks of dehydration
Supporting construction workers to avoid dangers.
Can your business afford to ignore mental well-being?
£70 - 100 billion annually in UK construction sector.
Mental health in the construction industry
World Mental Health Day 10 October.
Construction awards provide relief in wake of ISG collapse
Spike in major infrastructure awards, housing up but short of targets, are ISG collapse impacts yet to come.
Biodiversity net gain with related updates and terms
Only 0.5% of applications subject to BNG in the context significant proposed changes to planning.
As political power has shifted from blue to red
Has planning now moved from brown to green?
The role of construction in tackling the biodiversity crisis
New CIOB Nature of Building digital series available now.
The Nature Towns and Cities initiative
Grants of up to 1 million for local councils and partners.
The continued ISG fall out October updates
Where to look for answers to frequently asked questions.
Building safety remediation programme for Wales
With 2024 October progress updates.
In major support package for small businesses.
Conservation and transformation
Reading Ruskin’s cultural heritage. Book review.