Will government waste the opportunity of the National Infrastructure Assessment?
|
| One year on from the publication of the National Infrastructure Assessment, we await the government’s response. Politicians are at risk of missing the opportunity to tackle Britain’s challenges, writes Chris Richards. |
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The world is changing rapidly. A range of factors that will impact society are converging, including population growth, demographic shifts and rapid urbanisation, but above all else we have the burning platform of a burning planet that urgently needs to be addressed.
Infrastructure has been core to solving societal problems in the past and it remains core today. Investing timely, effectively and efficiently in the right infrastructure has a central role to play in addressing the challenges above, or we risk condemning ourselves and future generations to living in slums while grappling with extreme climate conditions.
[edit] Societal challenges don’t go away if you ignore them, they only get more costly
It was with this in mind that the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) was set up in the UK. It is an independent body tasked with looking ahead across the coming decades to identify the key challenges and opportunities and how infrastructure can be used to address them. Politicians of all stripes would then have a ready body of evidence to use to make their decisions on infrastructure in a timely manner.
History has shown that where decisions on infrastructure are not made, the underlying challenges do not go away, but simply grow in impact and potential cost if not addressed.
Delaying a decision is a decision in itself; a decision to cost the taxpayer more through missed benefits, achieved through more optimised infrastructure networks; and to cost the taxpayer more through higher project costs when solutions have to be accelerated to meet the need.
The Committee on Climate Change in its 2019 Progress Report to Parliament has warned of the impact of delay today, noting that while the government has legislated for a net-zero emissions target, "action to curb greenhouse gas emissions is lagging far behind what is needed, even to meet previous, less stringent, emissions targets".
[edit] One year on from the National Infrastructure Assessment
July 10 marks one year since the NIC’s work, the National Infrastructure Assessment (NIA), was published. A world-beating body of evidence, the NIA set out in detail the key steps needed to address congestion, capacity constraints and carbon emissions across Britain.
However, the true benefit of the NIA is that it is an endowment of solid evidence for the country to start the conversation now, on the best options for the future, to maximise benefits and minimise costs and impact.
The government was supposed to respond within one year to the NIA, however this has been pushed to autumn 2019, given other domestic, political considerations. There is now a risk that the NIA will be wasted.
Despite warm words about infrastructure and the National Infrastructure Commission from both candidates - Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt - vying to be the next prime minister, action once in post will be important. This includes moving swiftly to direct the efforts of government toward responding robustly to the NIA before the end of the year.
While politicians across the spectrum are rightly focussed on how best to deliver the result of the Brexit referendum, they cannot allow Britain’s challenges to slip down the agenda.
Fortunately, in the NIA they have been given a ready set of solutions to some of the knottier, long-term challenges that require decisions today. They should not let that opportunity go to waste.
[edit] About this article
This article was written by ice.org.uk Chris Richards, Head of Policy and Public Affairs at the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). It was previously published in July 2019 on the ICE website and can be accessed here.
Other articles by the ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki can be accessed here.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building our Industrial Strategy: green paper.
- Construction 2025.
- Osborne launches National Infrastructure Commission.
- Government construction strategy.
- Industrial Strategy: building a Britain fit for the future.
- Interim National Infrastructure Assessment, Congestion, Capacity, Carbon.
- National Infrastructure Commission call for evidence.
- National Infrastructure Commission.
- National Infrastructure Plan.
- National Infrastructure Pipeline.
- National Infrastructure Plan for Skills.
- Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
Featured articles and news
Change of use legislation breaths new life into buildings
A run down on Class MA of the General Permitted Development Order.
Solar generation in the historic environment
Success requires understanding each site in detail.
Level 6 Design, Construction and Management BSc
CIOB launches first-ever degree programme to develop the next generation of construction leaders.
Open for business as of April, with its 2026 prospectus and new pipeline of housing schemes.
The operational value of workforce health
Keeping projects moving. Incorporating unplanned absence and the importance of health, in operations.
A carbon case for indigenous slate
UK slate can offer clear embodied carbon advantages.
Costs and insolvencies mount for SMEs, despite growth
Construction sector under insolvency and wage bill pressure in part linked to National Insurance, says report.
The place for vitrified clay pipes in modern infrastructure
Why vitrified clay pipes are reclaiming their role in built projects.
Research by construction PR consultancy LMC published.
Roles and responsibilities of domestic clients
ACA Safety in Construction guide for domestic clients.
Fire door compliance in UK commercial buildings
Architect and manufacturer gives their low down.
The new towns and strategic environmental assessments
12 locations of the New Towns Taskforce reduced to 7 within the new towns draft programme and open consultation.
Buildings that changed the future of architecture. Book review.



















