Tender price appraisal in the construction industry
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
A tender is a submission made by a prospective supplier in response to an invitation to tender (ITT). It makes an offer for the supply of goods and/or services. An invitation to tender might be issued for a range of contracts, including; equipment supply, the main construction contract (perhaps including design by the contractor), demolition, enabling works, and so on.
Once tenders have been received, a thorough process of assessment is undertaken to identify the preferred tenderer. The tender pricing document is a key aspect of the tender return that will be assessed by the cost consultant to determine where value lies within the different tenders and to enable a like for like comparison between tenderer prices.
[edit] Preparation
To ensure a like for like comparison, the tender consultants need to ensure that a standard format is completed by all tenderers. The format of the document can be different depending on the form of contract selected.
Examples of pricing formats include:
- Bill of quantities (with quantities).
- Bill of quantities (without quantities).
- Schedule of rates.
- Contract sum analysis.
- Any other bespoke template formulated by the tender consultants.
[edit] Assessment
The tender price assessment will commence once all tenders have been received and opened and reviewed for compliance. Non-compliant tenders may be excluded unless they were specifically permitted in the invitation to tender.
The pricing comparison will then be carried out by a cost consultant. The cost consultant will use their own benchmark document to compare the tender prices against.
The assessment will enable the consultant to:
- Provide a like-for-like comparison between tenderers and the cost plan (benchmark).
- Assess value for money.
- Check arithmetic.
- Identify significant differences in pricing to ensure tenderers have interpreted the specification correctly.
- Identify potential areas of savings that can be negotiated with the tenderers.
- Review rate distribution (ensure that the tenderers have not front loaded the project).
- Prepare a tender report.
[edit] Review and action
Arithmetical errors will need to be reviewed in accordance with the tender guidance rules. Government contracts might have strict guidance on the correction of errors and disallow contract sum changes. The private sector might be more lenient and allow price reduction corrections. It is important to capture any changes and confirm this in writing and keep records of any communication.
Any other areas of qualification by tenderers must also be assessed. Tenderers might add qualifications to their price that will influence the contact sum. An example is a clarification that might limit the tenderers price to only a certain depth when it comes to excavations.
Any other big price discrepancies should be highlighted and reviewed. If a price is too low it can also be a risk to the project. The project can become a financial burden on the tenderer and they are unlikely to perform satisfactorily. The cost consultant will have to assess the reason for the low price. If it is due to misinterpretation of the design or low wages, it can have an impact on the outcome of the project. It is important to distinguish between a legitimate keen commercial price and a non-compliant tenderer price.
The cost consultant will provide a summary of the cost assessment and conclude with a contract sum that will form part of the tender report and subsequently become part of the contractual documents.
However, the tenderer with the lowest price may not necessarily be awarded the contract, as other criteria such as experience, availability, value for money and so on may also be considered. For more information see: Selection criteria.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Government outcome to the late payment consultation, ECA reacts.
IHBC 2025 Gus Astley Student Award winners
Work on the role of hewing in UK historic conservation a win for Jack Parker of Oxford Brookes University.
Future Homes Building Standards and plug-in solar
Parts F and L amendments, the availability of solar panels and industry responses.
How later living housing can help solve the housing crisis
Unlocking homes, unlocking lives.
Preparing safety case reports for HRBs under the BSA
A new practical guide to preparing structural inputs for safety cases and safety case reports published by IStructE.
Male construction workers and prostate cancer
CIOB and Prostate Cancer UK encourage awareness of prostate cancer risks, and what to do about it.
The changed R&D tax landscape for Architects
Specialist gives a recap on tax changes for Research and Development, via the ACA newsletter.
Structured product data as a competitive advantage
NBS explain why accessible product data that works across digital systems is key.
Welsh retrofit workforce assessment
Welsh Government report confirms Wales faces major electrical skills shortage, warns ECA.
A now architectural practice looks back at its concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement 25 years on.
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
Government report and back track on copyright opt out for AI training but no clear preferred alternative as yet.
Embedding AI tools into architectural education
Beyond the render: LMU share how student led research is shaping the future of visualisation workflows.
Why document control still fails UK construction projects
A Chartered Quantity Surveyor explains what needs to change and how.
Inspiration for a new 2026 wave of Irish construction professionals.
New planning reforms and Warm Homes Bill
Take centre stage at UK Construction Week London.
A brief run down of changes intentions from April in an onwards.






















