Template letter responding to request for bespoke appointment contract
2nd May 2016
Mr J. Smith
Dear Mr Smith
Re: Appointment for Project
Following our telephone conversation regarding appointment I would like to respond to your request for signing a bespoke appointment.
The professional principals at stake are both statutory and personal;
Under the Architects Act 1997 we are required to abide by the ARB’s (Architects Registration Board) Architects Code: Standards of Conduct and Practice (2010) and as RIBA Chartered Practice, The RIBA Code of Professional Conduct lays down criteria that I must satisfy before starting work. They require written agreement with clearly defined services, maintaining our insurance cover and having the skills and resources to fulfil the obligations of the contract.
An example of this; our professional indemnity insurance (PII) is unlikely to cover a ‘fitness for purpose’ rather than ‘duty of care’ type clause which would leave us uninsured and liable for claims of professional misconduct.
There will be an additional charge/cost and a delay to the preparation of the contract. I must also highlight to you that we have prepared our fee based on the RIBA standard agreement, which apportions risk fairly between the parties, equally weighted and has been tried and tested in a court of law. We would therefore have to review and adjust the fee on the basis of any reapportioning of risk.
We use the RIBA standard form of appointment on all of our projects and are familiar with each of its terms. I am happy to hold a meeting to discuss whether this would be suitable for you. The appointment also has the potential to make amendments and we can discuss specific terms you may be interested in including. If not please let us know your concerns?
I would like to take this opportunity to send a Client Care Letter outlining;
- The proposed fee as calculated with regards to our duties and schedule of services previously stated under the RIBA Standard Agreement 2010 (2012 revision)
- Suspension and termination
- Dispute resolution
We can discuss this at our appointment workshop – alternatively, if you wish us to proceed on the above mentioned assumptions of the RIBA SA 2010 (2012) please return a signed copy of the letter.
If you have any queries please do not hesitate to call. I look forward to hearing from you in due course.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Appointing consultants.
- Architects fees.
- Collaborative practices.
- Collateral warranties
- Consultant team.
- Consultant's proposals.
- Design liability.
- Employer's information requirements.
- Fee proposals.
- Framework agreements.
- Integrated Supply Team.
- Letter of appointment.
- Pre-qualification questionnaire.
- Procurement route.
- Professional Indemnity Insurance clause in conditions of engagement.
- Professional indemnity insurance.
- Programme consultant.
- Proprietary information.
- Request for proposals.
- Schedule of services.
Featured articles and news
Graphene has many potential applications, but when will it start being used in civil engineering?
Increasing productivity – now more than ever as we lead up to Brexit – should be the sector’s number one priority in 2018.
Carillion's collapse causes Construction Leadership Council to delay the construction sector deal report.
Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability: international frameworks, national and local guidance.
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.