Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT)
[edit] Introduction
The Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) is a method of assessment that can be used as the selection procedure, allowing the contracting party to award the contract based on aspects of the tender submission other than just price.
MEAT was introduced by the European Parliament in January 2014. The European Union Procurement Directives established public procurement rules that apply to any public purchases above defined thresholds, and these are enacted in the UK by The Public Contracts Regulations.
The ‘alternative’ criteria which can be used in a MEAT assessment include:
- Quality.
- Price or cost using a cost-effectiveness approach.
- Technical merit.
- Aesthetic and functional characteristics.
- Accessibility.
- Social characteristics.
- Environmental characteristics.
- Innovative characteristics.
- After-sales service and technical assistance.
- Delivery conditions such as date, process and period.
Each of the criteria used is given a relative weighting, which must be set out in the tender documents. Alternatively, they can be listed in descending order of importance.
The rules stipulate that the contract notice must make clear to tenderers that the MEAT criteria will be used to judge their submission. The criteria cannot then be changed.
A two-stage process of tender evaluation can then be used. The first stage is a technical evaluation which uses individual weighted criteria to assess the technical merit of the tenders. The second stage is a financial evaluation which calculates the relative cost of each tender compared to the lowest price offered. Finally, the tenders are ranked based on the aggregate score of both stages.
[edit] Post Brexit reform
On 15 December 2020, the Green Paper Transforming Public Procurement was presented to Parliament by the Cabinet Office and Lord Agnew, the Minister of State for Efficiency and Transformation. The paper proposed several changes to procurement policy in the UK to reflect the country’s post-Brexit status.
During the UK’s membership of the EU, MEAT public procurement rules applied to any public purchases above defined thresholds and were overseen in the UK by the Public Contracts Regulations (PCR). Post-Brexit recommendations in the Transforming Public Procurement green paper proposed the replacement of MEAT procurement rules with MAT, essentially removing the ‘economic’ component from the method of assessment.
The thought process behind this modification was the idea that ‘economic’ could sometimes be interpreted simply as lowest price. Under MEAT, evaluating certain economic factors (such as quality) was seen as complex and potentially restrictive.
For more information see: Most advantageous tender.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Not buildings. Happy holiday from DB.
Future Homes Standard: Industry calls for more ambition
As the Government FHS consultation finally closes.
Improving government projects with data and AI
Enabling better outcomes, efficient modern delivery and influential leadership on government projects.
BSRIA Living Laboratory Innovation Challenge
Final days for submission, closing March 29.
Windows, their frames, forms, factors and functions.
The hidden subtleties of U-Value calculations
Different contexts and what to include as variables.
A brief run down with related articles.
Electrical sector calls for safer public EV charge points
Serious concerns about electrical safety in the public domain.
Building Blocks manifesto presented to parliament
Architects Declare call in for support of five critical policies.
The four elements of project management with APM
Analysis, expectations, collaborative communication and partnerships.
City of London launches Heritage Building Retrofit Toolkit
Empowering owners to initiate necessary adaptations.
Guidance on RAAC in listed buildings
Published by Purcell, endorsed by IHBC, SPAB and C20.
Learning from the past.
Reluctance to hire people with criminal convictions revealed
Employing People with Criminal Convictions Report.
Tackling unconscious bias; Women's History Month
Personal reflections, as the last week of March approaches.
Comments