- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 25 Jan 2018
In Plain Sight: reducing the risk of infrastructure failure
‘In plain sight: reducing the risk of infrastructure failure. An interim report’ is the first output from the review, published in November 2017.
The Grenfell Tower fire was a profound shock for the country and raised the concern that any failings may be found to be systemic and not site specific. In these circumstances, organisations for professionals in all areas of the built environment sector should examine whether action needs to be taken to deliver safer and more effective whole-life stewardship of assets.
 Background to the interim report
Much of infrastructure comprises legacy assets put to daily use by far more people than originally envisaged. For new assets, the procurement, funding and management techniques may be complex. This can cause difficulties around continuity of knowledge, vision and intent.
 Interim report recommendations
The key lesson from previous incidents in infrastructure and other sectors is there is never one single cause of failure. Failures happen when multiple factors align at a single point in time, for example: human error; poor design; weather conditions, etc.
The Panel’s interim conclusions are the result of a two month period of study and consultation. The Panel has found that while the risk of a major failure of UK infrastructure is relatively low, it is still not low enough. ICE should, work with government and other stakeholders, to consider afresh what steps are necessary to reduce further risks of failure.
The interim report has four main areas of recommendation:
 Lesson sharing
ICE should review the robustness of its Continuing Professional Development regime and Professional Code of Conduct. ICE should also review the effectiveness of arrangements for professional oversight of assets in different sub-sectors of infrastructure.
ICE should work with other infrastructure organisations to identify if improvements can be made to the governance role in the development and management of assets. This should include the competence of boards, scrutiny systems and the presence of a technically competent engineering voice in safety-critical decisions.
In addition to commissioning a study on the 12 lines of defence, the Panel recommends establishing three Task and Finish groups to take forward the three areas of Lesson sharing, Competence and Governance.
You can download the report here.
This article was originally published here by ICE on 6th Nov 2017. It was written by Gavin Miller.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles by ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Avoiding disaster in existing buildings and infrastructure.
- Building our Industrial Strategy: green paper.
- Government construction and infrastructure pipelines.
- Highways Infrastructure Asset Management Plans.
- National Infrastructure Commission.
- National Infrastructure Plan.
- National Infrastructure Plan for Skills.
Featured articles and news
Consistently one of our most popular articles - so just how much do you know about BoQ's?
Significant updates encourage whole building life cycle assessment and recognise products with Environmental Product Declarations.
Gustavo Giovannoni’s role in integrating modern planning requirements into historic town centres.
Desipite Hackitt's recommendations, the government are to consult on combustible cladding.
People or density - can we create urban liveability at ever-increasing densities?
3D printing is the computer-controlled sequential layering of materials to create 3D shapes.
Hackitt review calls for a radical rethink of the whole system and how it works.
Life cycle assessment is used to total up the environmental impact of a product’s supply chain. But why building LCA?
The government warns building owners of a performance issue with Grenfell fire doors.