IHBC response to revised NPPF
In July 2018, the government published the revised National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
In response, IHBC officers highlighted the chances missed, as Policy Secretary Roy Lewis said, "...from a built heritage perspective, the revised NPPF is an opportunity lost", while IHBC Communications Secretary Dave Chetwyn, noted that, "There appears still to be an assumption of high growth land and property economies, but this is not just a north-south issue – we are addressing problems in areas with serious viability challenges."
IHBC Policy Secretary, Roy Lewis said:
"The new policy statement that ‘the creation of high quality buildings is fundamental to what the planning and development process should achieve’ is a welcome response to the IHBC’s joint submission with Civic Voice and others on the ‘Design’ element of the Framework. However, the Institute’s comprehensive suggestions to refine the policy base for ‘Conservation of the historic environment’ has made no impact whatsoever.
"It is particularly disappointing that the government has done nothing to help resolve the interpretation problems caused by the policy distinction between ‘substantial harm’ and ‘less than substantial harm’. IHBC’s advice that that the distinction is an unnecessary complication has been ignored. As a result, debating ‘where the substantial harm/less than substantial harm join comes’ will continue to be an unnecessary complication in the process of determination of planning proposals that have a harmful impact on heritage assets, particularly in planning enquiries.
"The Institute’s call for specific policies that acknowledge the fundamental differences between listed buildings, conservation areas, scheduled monuments, parks and gardens, etc. has also fallen on deaf ears.
"Surprisingly, the reference to ‘optimum viable use’ in relation to countervailing benefits that might outweigh less than substantial harm, has been re-introduced having been omitted in the consultation draft. This maintains the inconsistency that ‘optimum viable use’ is a consideration if the proposal causes less than substantial harm whilst ‘viable use’ is the issue if substantial harm is caused. However, a conveniently inserted ‘where appropriate’ proviso gets rid of the ridiculous notion of optimum viable use of a conservation area.
"It’s not all good news in the ‘Design’ chapter either (now re-titled ‘Achieving well-designed places’), which no longer has a protective provision for designated heritage assets or their settings. And the deletion of former paragraph 60, along with its confirmation that it is proper to seek to promote or reinforce local distinctiveness, cannot be helpful.
"Unfortunately, it will be a long wait before we get another opportunity to shape planning policy for the historic environment. From a built heritage perspective, the revised NPPF is an opportunity lost."
This article was originally published here on 27 July 2018 by IHBC.
--Institute of Historic Building Conservation
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
IHBC NewsBlog
IHBC Launches new ‘Guidance Note’ on Alterations to Listed Buildings
The IHBC’s latest Toolbox Guidance Note, on ‘Alterations to Listed Buildings’ has been issued following UK-wide consultation.
Caithness Iron Age Stone Tower Conserved
The ruins of Ousdale Burn Broch, north of Helmsdale in Caithness, had fallen into further disrepair over the past 130 years.
The American Air Museum at Duxford has been listed Grade II*
Europe’s largest air museum and Britain’s best-preserved Second World War airfield – has been included in Grade II* listing, even though technically too recent.
West Dean College wins Sussex Heritage Trust Award 2020 for Roof Restoration
The College of Arts and Conservation has won the award for a for a project which provides or improves facilities for the community, including a £5.8M restoration of the College’s 126-year-old roof.
Stowe North Hall & WMF: A Step Closer to Completion
Completion of the restoration of Stowe House’s North Hall, largely funded by World Monuments Fund (WMF), came a step closer this summer with the installation of a statue of Mercury opposite the imposing Laocoön group installed last year.
IHBC CREATIVE Conservation Fund launched
The CREATIVE Conservation Fund helps the IHBC generate and distribute funds exclusively to deserving causes in built and historic environment conservation.
The tunnel near Plymouth with a nuclear secret
For years, there have been rumours whispered around Plymouth and Cornwall about so-called ‘nuclear tunnels’ that exist beneath the Tamar Valley.
141 bridges with ‘very poor’ rating remain open to avoid disruption
Just under half of England’s busiest bridges are severely defected or damaged, but have remained open due to concerns about an influx of traffic should repairs be ordered, it has been revealed.
IHBC’s new issue of 'Context' released, Oxford themed
The issue focusses on the future of an historic city – Oxford – and includes an introduction by Layla Moran MP, Chair of the new APPG on Conservation, People and Places which has the IHBC as its Secretariat.
Lawyers examine legality of planning approval for Stonehenge Tunnel
Opponents of the Stonehenge Tunnel have instructed lawyers to examine the legality of transport secretary Grant Shapps’ decision to give the scheme the green light.