Hold harmless agreement
A hold harmless agreement is a clause typically included in construction contracts, in order not to hold one party liable for the acts of the other. It can be a unilateral or reciprocal agreement and is commonly provided by a subcontractor to the main contractor.
The provisions of such an agreement mean that the risk of being held liable for loss or damage due to the actions of another are minimised and a claim for indemnity can be pursued. In terms of a reciprocal agreement, both parties are covered, i.e. the subcontractor will not be held liable for loss or damage caused by the main contractor and vice versa.
The protection provided by the agreement varies according to the jurisdiction, but in general, they must include an express indemnification, that is, a written agreement that secures or protects a person/party from the legal responsibility of a loss. The named party who that takes responsibility is known as the ‘indemnitor’ while the named party to be protected is known as the ‘indemnitee’.
There are three basic types of hold harmless agreements:
- Broad form: This type holds that the indemnitor will assume all risk for liability regardless of whether responsibility lies with the indemnitee.
- Intermediate form: This is the most commonly used type and holds that the indemnitor will assume all risk for liability unless responsibility lies solely with the indemnitee.
- Limited form: This type holds that the indemnitor will only assume the risk of liability for loss caused by their own actions.
Key features of a hold harmless agreement include:
- Indemnification: The party providing the hold harmless (the indemnitor) agrees to compensate the other party (the indemnitee) for any losses, damages, or legal costs that arise from specific circumstances outlined in the agreement.
- Scope of Protection: Specifies the types of claims or liabilities covered, such as personal injury, property damage, or financial losses related to the construction project.
- Duration: Defines the period during which the hold harmless provisions apply, which could be during the construction phase or extend beyond project completion.
- Exclusions: Identifies any exclusions or limitations to the hold harmless provision, such as negligence or willful misconduct by the indemnitee.
Common scenarios for hold harmless agreements include:
- A contractor may agree to hold the client harmless for any claims arising from the contractor's work, such as accidents or property damage occurring on-site.
- A subcontractor might agree to indemnify the main contractor against any liabilities resulting from the subcontractor’s actions or omissions.
- A supplier may provide a hold harmless agreement protecting the contractor from claims related to defective materials or equipment supplied.
The terms of hold harmless agreements are often heavily negotiated to balance the interests and risk tolerance of both parties. The enforceability of hold harmless agreements can vary depending on the specific wording and circumstances. Courts may scrutinise these clauses, especially if they appear overly broad or unfair. It is essential for parties to have appropriate insurance coverage to back up their indemnity obligations.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Guidance notes to prepare for April ERA changes
From the Electrical Contractors' Association Employee Relations team.
Significant changes to be seen from the new ERA in 2026 and 2027, starting on 6 April 2026.
First aid in the modern workplace with St John Ambulance.
Ireland's National Residential Retrofit Plan
Staged initiatives introduced step by step.
Solar panels, pitched roofs and risk of fire spread
60% increase in solar panel fires prompts tests and installation warnings.
Modernising heat networks with Heat interface unit
Why HIUs hold the key to efficiency upgrades.
Reflecting on the work of the CIOB Academy
Looking back on 2025 and where it's going next.
Procurement in construction: Knowledge hub
Brief, overview, key articles and over 1000 more covering procurement.
Sir John Betjeman’s love of Victorian church architecture.
Exchange for Change for UK deposit return scheme
The UK Deposit Management Organisation established to deliver Deposit Return Scheme unveils trading name.
A guide to integrating heat pumps
As the Future Homes Standard approaches Future Homes Hub publishes hints and tips for Architects and Architectural Technologists.
BSR as a standalone body; statements, key roles, context
Statements from key figures in key and changing roles.
ECA launches Welsh Election Manifesto
ECA calls on political parties at 100 day milestone to the Senedd elections.
Resident engagement as the key to successful retrofits
Retrofit is about people, not just buildings, from early starts to beyond handover.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.























