- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 10 Feb 2021
Higher penalties for employers breaching workers' rights
Where an employment tribunal finds that an employer has breached the claimant's employment rights, the tribunal can order the employer to pay a financial penalty if it is of the view that the breach has aggravating features. A tribunal will consider the employer’s ability to pay before making an award, which will impact more on larger employers considered to have deeper pockets.
The legislation does not define what “aggravating features” are. However, explanatory notes to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 suggest that an Employment Tribunal is more likely to find aggravating features where the employer’s action was deliberate or committed with malice, or where it has repeatedly breached the employment right concerned. Larger organisations with a dedicated human resources (HR) team are more likely to be penalised than smaller ones with little or no HR support. Employers should not normally be penalised for unintended or accidental shortcomings.
The penalty will usually be 50% of the award made to the claimant (e.g if the award made to the claimant is £1,000, the penalty will normally be £500), subject to a minimum of £100 and a maximum of £20,000. The maximum limit on these penalties was increased on April 6, 2019, from £5,000 to £20,000. Employers will qualify for a 50% reduction if they pay the penalty no later than 21 days after the notice of the decision to impose the penalty is sent to them (following the example above, the penalty will be reduced to £250 from £500 if paid within 21 days).
The money raised from imposing penalties (still following the examples above either a full penalty of £500 or a reduced one of £250) will be payable to the Exchequer, and not the claimant. The penalty will be in addition to any compensation awarded to the claimant (£1000 following the example above).
All employers should ensure that they comply with employment law and act fairly when implementing workplace practices and policies to avoid tribunal claims and the financial penalties that may come with them.
 About this article
This article was written by Orazio Amantia, ECA Senior Employee Relations Advisor. It was previously published in July 2019 on the website of the Electrical Contractors' Association (ECA) and can be accessed here.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Adversarial behaviour in the UK construction industry.
- Alternative dispute resolution legislation.
- Causes of construction disputes.
- Conflict avoidance.
- Construction Industry Model Arbitration Rules CIMAR.
- Dispute resolution.
- Dispute resolution boards.
- Dispute resolution procedure.
- Expert determination.
- Expert evaluation.
- Expert witness.
- Third party opinion and fixed-fee mediation procedures.
- Pay now argue later.
- Pendulum arbitration.
- The role of the mediator.
- Scheme for Construction Contracts.
Featured articles and news
CIAT reporting from the Competition and Markets Authority.
Making sustainable construction number one priority.
Interview with ECA CEO.
Many provisions came into force on June 28, 2022.
With room to expand.
Refurbishment, Energy Efficiency, Indoor air and process.
Why building acoustic considerations must be non-negotiable.
Aluminium Composite Panels (ACP) is one example.
Inventors and innovators at ICE.
Life, death and art at the Stuart court. Book review.
Real estate, place adaptation and innovation.
Review and comment on the revised draft before July 11.
Write about something you know, help us build and grow !
A blended event and triumphant return.
Mark Reynolds succeeds Andy Mitchell as Co-Chair of CLC
Designing Buildings is 10 years old.
From alteration to deconstruction on DB.
Changes come into force for F,L,O and S.