Construction (Head Protection) Regulations
[edit] Key takeaways
These regulations mandated employers to provide and ensure the wearing of suitable head protection on construction sites. The primary duty was to assess the risk of head injury and act unless no foreseeable risk existed. Site controllers had to implement written rules, and Sikhs who wear turbans were exempt. The regulations were revoked in 2013, with their requirements now covered under broader PPE legislation.
[edit] Background
The Construction (Head Protection) Regulations 1989 were introduced to safeguard workers on construction and engineering sites from head injuries. The rules required that employers or self-employed persons provide suitable head protection—typically safety helmets—whenever there was a foreseeable risk to the head. Those in control of a site were responsible for establishing written rules to enforce helmet use and ensuring compliance by everyone on site. Notably, there was an exemption for Sikhs wearing turbans, acknowledging religious requirements while upholding broader site safety obligations.
These regulations came into force on 30 March 1990 but were repealed on 6 April 2013. The Health and Safety (Miscellaneous Repeals, Revocations and Amendments) Regulations 2013 removed the 1989 rules, as their requirements had become redundant—covered instead by the more general Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 (as amended) and other construction regulations.
Under the 1989 regulations, the safety helmet had to be maintained, replaced as necessary, and worn correctly according to the site rules. The employer or site manager had to actively enforce these provisions. The turban-wearing Sikh exemption applied only to head protection; individuals still had to comply with other PPE requirements.
Today, although the 1989 Regulations are no longer in effect, the obligation to provide and ensure the wearing of suitable head protection persists under the 1992 PPE Regulations, which place a duty on employers to supply appropriate protective equipment and ensure its use when risks remain after other mitigations.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Tackle the decline in Welsh electrical apprenticeships
ECA calls on political parties 100 days to the Senedd elections.
Resident engagement as the key to successful retrofits
Retrofit is about people, not just buildings, from early starts to beyond handover.
What they are, how they work and why they are popular in many countries.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.






















