The New Engineering Contract (NEC) is a suite of construction contracts intended to promote partnering and collaboration between the contractor and client. It was developed as a reaction to other more traditional forms of construction contract which have been portrayed by some as adversarial. The third edition, NEC3 was published in 2005.
The suite of NEC documents includes the Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC), the most frequently used NEC3 contract, suitable for the appointment of a contractor for engineering and construction work, such as infrastructure, buildings, highways and process plants, including any level of design responsibility.
Within the ECC, the ‘accepted programme’, is ‘…identified within the Contract Data or during the project it will be superseded by a later programme – there is a process for submission and this must be accepted by the project manager. The programme is to be practicable and realistic, showing when the contractor intends to carry out each part of the works identifying the resource he intends to use – this tool is invaluable in successfully managing a contract.’ Ref NEC, NEC3 Dictionary.
Within the ECC, the ‘activity schedule’ allocates a price to each activity undertaken during the works. This simplifies the administration of the interim payment process. The accepted programme shows how the activities on the activity schedule are programmed.
The accepted programme and the activity schedule need not show exactly the same activities, but there should be correlation between them, and they should be kept up to date. For example, if a compensation event changes the programme for subsequent work, a revised programme should be prepared and submitted by the contractor.
Without an accepted programme the contract cannot be administered properly. Under such circumstances, 25% of payments can be withheld, and it is not possible to assess compensation events.
The contract may require that a revised programme is submitted regularly, setting out the sequence of activities, progress, and the effect of compensation events. Accepting the programme does not discharge the contractor of any responsibility, it simply accepts that the programme is realistic and that it can be used to assess future changes. If the programme is not accepted by the project manager, reasons for not accepting it must be given.
Reasons might include:
- It is not practical.
- It does not show required information.
- It does not properly represent the actual programme for activities.
- It does not show the full works.
The contractor must then submit a revised programme.
Failure to accept or reject a programme may constitute a compensation event.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Activity schedule.
- Compensation event.
- Contract conditions.
- Contract data.
- Contractor's master programme.
- Defined cost.
- Delay damages.
- Disallowed cost.
- Early warning notice.
- Key dates.
- NEC contract change management systems.
- NEC early contractor involvement.
- Programme for building design and construction.
- Progress in construction.
- Short period programme.
- Tender works programme.
- Time Risk Allowance TRA.
- Works information.
- Z clauses.
Featured articles and news
It was the tallest structure in the world for 3,800 years, but to this day the exact construction techniques are a mystery.
Shortlist for the industry's most coveted award announced.
Government responds to Mark Farmer's review of industry, rejecting the call for a levy on clients.
Peter Hansford to examine what wider lessons can be learned from the fire.
Every project is subject to uncertainty. How can construction better understand uncertainty for performance improvement?
MAD Architects reveal their designs for a futuristic campus for electric car manufacturer.
Homebuyers could borrow more with better forecasting of energy bills, according to industry consortium's new report.
Read our introductory article on carbon capture and storage.
Have a look at Frank Gehry's Binoculars Building in Los Angeles.
BRE publish new Loss Prevention Standard seeking to minimise fire risk from ducting.
How do we tell which infrastructure projects will work?
CIAT announce the establishment of a Working Group in light of Grenfell and call for contributions.
In 1900, 15% of global population lived in cities. Now it’s over 50%. Which is why we need ‘hydroinformatics’ to consume smarter.
Have a look at these competition-winning designs for a new residential development in Eindhoven.