Prolongation in construction contracts
The term ‘prolongation’ refers to the extra costs that a contractor may incur as a result of the completion of the works being delayed by an event that is the responsibility of the client. Such events might include; failing to give the contractor possession of the site on the date specified in the contract; delays in giving instructions and so on. The contractor may incur additional costs as a result of having to remain on site for longer than anticipated, for example, additional labour costs, plant costs, off-site overheads, fluctuations and so on.
Prolongation is sometimes described as being synonymous with ‘loss and expense’ however, this is incorrect. Loss and expense is a wider term that refers to matters which are the responsibility of the client that materially affect the progress of the works. This includes matters that disrupt, rather than delay the progress of the works, but still entitle the contractor to make a claim for additional costs incurred. Claims for disruption result from the additional cost of adopting inefficient working methods as a result of the disruption.
Generally prolongation is easier to prove than disruption.
For more information see: Loss and expense.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Concurrent delay.
- Consequential loss.
- Extension of time.
- Force majeure.
- Liquidated damages.
- Loss and expense.
- Profit and overheads.
- Programme consultant.
- Relevant event.
 External references
- Isurv. Loss and expense claims.
Featured articles and news
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.