Penal contractual terms
Penal contractual terms that seek to impose exorbitant or unconscionable obligations are generally not worth the paper they are written on.
In the case of Vivienne Westwood Ltd. v Conduit Street Development Ltd. (2017), the High Court found one such term unenforceable in the context of a side letter to a retail lease.
A tenant had taken a 15-year lease of shop premises at an initial rent of £110,000 a year, subject to upwards only rent reviews every five years. On the same day as the lease was executed, a side letter was signed whereby the landlord agreed to accept a reduced rent of £90,000 in the first year, rising to £100,000 in year five.
The letter also provided that the rent would be capped at £125,000 a year in the succeeding five years. The letter stated that the agreement was terminable by the landlord with immediate effect if the tenant breached any of its terms or conditions. In the event of termination, a term of the letter provided that rent would be payable in accordance with the lease as if the side agreement had never existed.
Following the first rent review, the landlord sought to increase the rent payable to £232,500 a year on the ground that rent had been paid late, which was a breach of the conditions in the side letter. The tenant launched proceedings in order to hold the landlord to the rent cap agreed in the side letter.
In upholding the tenant’s arguments, the Court found that the term relating to termination of the agreement contained therein was unenforceable as a contractual penalty.
The term sought to impose a greater obligation on the tenant than that which was contained within the lease. Termination of the agreement at any time within the first ten years of the lease would have the effect that the tenant would be obliged to pay additional rent for all the preceding years as well as in the future.
The obligation to pay increased rent on termination was a blunt instrument that could give rise to the tenant suffering substantial and disproportionate financial detriment for a minor breach of covenant that caused no harm to the landlord’s interests.
Notwithstanding the equality of bargaining power between the landlord and the tenant, the term was exorbitant and unconscionable in its potential effects. In the circumstances, the term was of no effect and the rent was capped in line with the other provisions of the side letter.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
ECA Industry Awards 2024 shortlist revealed
22 leading businesses from across the electrotechnical and engineering services sector.
Government unveils Skills England strategy
Skills England to transform opportunities and drive growth.
New Government Hub for York Given Planning Green Light
For up to 2,600 civil servants, due for completion by 2028.
Construction Skills Certification Scheme cards
July update on Professionally Qualified and Academically Qualified Person Cards.
BSRIA Briefing 2024, November 22
Sustainable Futures: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
The CLC on driving competency in the retrofit sector
Previously published roadmap on skills for net zero.
The first labour government King's speech in fifteen years
Construction industry reactions, support and some concern.
CIOB Retrofit of Buildings Technical Information Sheet
What retrofit is, the approach to be taken and processes to be followed.
Adapting Historic Buildings for Energy and Carbon Efficiency
Historic England advice note 18, free download published.
10 retrofit projects revisited 10 years after completion.
Information orders, building liability orders and SPVs
Key BSA terms and how they impact special purpose vehicles.
Listed despite problems with its design.
Zen and the art of cycling exploration.
Design Council Homes Taskforce launched
To support government 1.5 million homes target within UK climate commitments.