- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 06 Oct 2020
Partnering and joint ventures for construction
Local authorities, often the site owner, can enter into partnership arrangements in an effort to regenerate areas or encourage development of difficult sites. Such arrangements give more control to an authority than can be exercised through the planning system. Successfully implemented, such joint ventures can produce unfettered revenue streams that can be used by the authorities for whatever projects they are promoting.
A developer partner will provide skill sets that local authorities are unlikely to hold such as expertise in funding, design, procurement and marketing. Conversely the local authority provides knowledge and contacts in relation to transport, employment, infrastructure and planning. Under compulsory purchase legislation the local authorities may also have the power to acquire any sites necessary to maximise the potential value of any given scheme.
In order to remove letting risk from a project a local authority may enter into a sale and leaseback agreement with a funding organisation and developer guaranteeing rent and so giving certainty about revenues. This is attractive to funding institutions providing the capital for building the development. Generally the local authority is given a 25 year lease with provisions allowing them control over operational sub leases for letting space in a manner that meets its political and economic objectives.
Ground rents are usually generated when landowners wish to retain the freehold ownership of a site and retain a share in future financial growth of the developed site. Long leases of as much as 125 years are usually negotiated throughout which a landowner and its successors will be entitled an annual ground rent. Such arrangements allow the landowner a measure of control as to how the site is to be developed.
Ground rents can be calculated by taking the residual value of land as a percentage proportion of development costs (including finance and profit) and applying the percentage to a share of the annual revenue proceeds. In future rent reviews the percentage of the ground rent share remains the same. Thus a landlord shares any rental growth.
There are many ways of allocating the returns of a development among participants, reflecting levels of risk and reward. Overage agreements offer a land vendor on housing developments a share in any additional sales revenue beyond a base figure at a time when densities and planning outcomes are uncertain.
- A four slice of income approach, which involves three equity partners:
- A first charge as ground rent (landlord).
- The second charge on development cost (funding institution and developer with the funding organisation having first call on development costs).
- The third charge on development profit (developer).
- The fourth charge as a three way split of any additional profit.
- A three slice of income approach might be employed when the funding institution is not an equity partner but is lending funds on a loan draw down agreement.
- The first charge as ground rent (landlord).
- The second charge on development costs including anticipated profit (developer).
- The third as a two way split on additional profit.
- A two way slice of income approach might be used when a local authority or landlord carries the major portion of development risk.
- The first charge on development costs and profit (landlord with incentive fee to developer project manager).
- The second charge two ways split incentive arrangement.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Funding options.
- Joint venture.
- Partnering charter.
- PPC 2000.
- Property development finance.
- Special purpose vehicles.
- Types of construction organisation.
Featured articles and news
Final report proposes improvements for UK-wide transport infrastructure.
The decarbonisation transition has begun.
Can smart homes take care of their occupants?
A showcase of She ethnic culture.
CIOB creates charter and publishes special report.
Response submitted by IHBC.
Designed to accommodate flooding or waterway traffic.
ECA states concerns over the Government's disparate plans.
Net zero carbon future - necessity, not choice - was the event's focus.