New energy retrofit concept: 'renovation trains' for mass housing
This article summarises a research paper, ‘New energy retrofit concept: ‘renovation trains’ for mass housing’, by Ronald Rovers, published in 2014 in --Building Research & Information, 42:6, 757-767, DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2014.926764.
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the EU housing stock by 20% by 2020, requires either that the energy consumption of all houses is reduced by 20%, or that 20% of all houses are retro-fitted to a zero-carbon standard. There are approximately 213 million houses in the EU, so retrofitting 20% by 2020 would involve urgent and substantial works to more than 40 million houses.
This paper presents the findings of a pilot project which adopted a large-scale, rapid retrofitting process for 150 houses in Kerkrade in the Netherlands. The pilot focussed on the low-energy retrofit of social housing in an area suffering from decreasing density due to population changes. Retrofitted properties were a combination of one and two family terraced houses typical of 1970s construction, with non-load bearing front and rear facades.
The process is described as a ‘renovation train’, with the each set of activities moving on by one house a day and a total time of ten days per house. Works were undertaken whilst the houses were occupied as previous experience had shown that temporarily rehousing people was costly and stressful.
Inhabitants were asked to move their furniture 0.5 m away from the front and rear facades and a temporary plastic wall was installed to provide protection and create a small working space for the builders. The facades, roof and internal building services were renovated, but the rest of the house remained untouched. Prefabricated elements were used, with some piping and connections pre-installed. A modern heating boiler system was installed, along with photovoltaic panels, a storage tank and a ventilation heat exchanger.
The process cost more than €100,000 per house. However, the works gave the houses a 50-year prolonged lifetime and reduced energy costs from €140 to €40 a month. €60 of the savings go towards a rent increase to contribute to the retrofit, leaving the inhabitants with €40 a month.
The paper recommends that future projects should consider the environmental impact of materials, particularly if standards move from low energy to zero energy, as there is the potential to simply shift the carbon cost from operation to construction. Care must also be taken regarding people's perception of standardised solutions, and the desire for individuality in housing design.
Ronald Rovers (2014) New energy retrofit concept: ‘renovation trains’ for mass housing, Building Research & Information, 42:6, 757-767, DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2014.926764.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Anatomy of low carbon retrofits: evidence from owner-occupied superhomes.
- BRE and Willmott Dixon project to retrofit of a 1920s semi-detached house.
- Building Places that Work for Everyone.
- Ecobuild 2016 - Making the business case for large scale retrofit investment.
- Heat Energy: The Nation’s Forgotten Crisis.
- National Refurbishment Centre.
- Renovation v refurbishment v retrofit.
- Retrofit, refurbishment and the growth of connected HVAC technology.
- The cold man of europe 2015.
- The Each Home Counts report and traditional buildings.
- The real cost of poor housing.
LPOC notes ‘...it is perverse that repairs should be subject to VAT when new development is not'.
Loyd Grossman recently appeared on a BBC radio programme to discuss NIMBYism in heritage and development, the programme is currently available on BBC iPlayer.