- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 29 Jan 2016
This is the joining of a person/s to an action where common questions of law or fact arise.
Many construction disputes are resolved by the major participants to being joined in one proceeding. The benefit of this is that all related disputes are dealt with at once, with the consistency of being resolved by a single judge, jury, adjudicator, arbitration panel and so on.
For example, where design flaws are alleged to have contributed to a defect in the construction works, employers may seek to have the design professional(s) added as a party to proceedings to either defend their services or accept liability. Alternatively, two claimants could have a joint right, for example where there are joint contractors suing another party to the contract.
When courts are presented with a claim comprising a number of causes of action or parties that have been joined together, they have the power to separate them if the joinder is regarded as inconvenient. This could be because the joinder makes the claim unnecessarily complicated, or may cause delays or increase the costs in the claim.
An alternative to joinder is consolidation. This involves two or more separate claims with a strong link with each other being continued together with one claim being nominated as the lead. For example, this could be appropriate when the same allegations of negligence or breach of contract are made against the same defendant but in relation to different claims. Again, the court must exercise their power to consolidate claims with consideration of the time and cost implications.
 Find out more
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki:
- Construction Industry Model Arbitration Rules CIMAR.
- Construction litigation.
- Contribution and apportionment.
- Damages in construction contracts.
- Decennial liability.
- Good faith in construction contracts.
- Legal and equitable assignment
- Negligence in building design and construction.
- Recovery of third party losses.
 External references
- ‘The Construction Contracts Book’ (2nd ed.), BRENNAN, D.S. et al, American Bar Association (2008)
- InBrief - Joining participants and causes of action
Featured articles and news
Bringing in an expert.
Why the lowest price isn't sustainable.
The Most Economically Advantageous Tender.
Pipe dream or possibility?
The New Rules of Measurement.
Prioritising Sustainable Development Goals on projects.
The Architects Registration Board.
How BSRIA monitored the performance of new homes.
How to research a building when there are no primary sources.
A re-thatching project has supported a critically endangered skill.
What inspired the Metabolist movement in architecture?
A radical transformation of three agricultural barns.