ICE recommendations for the Government Construction Strategy 2018 update
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The publication of the Government Construction Strategy 2016 2020 was effective in introducing policy to drive change, such as mandating BIM Level 2 across publicly procured projects.
Whatever your view on the specific direction of travel, the strategy is a valuable vehicle for providing a progressive and consistent approach across the members of the Government Construction Board - Department for Transport, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Department of Education, Ministry of Justice, Department of Health, Defence Infrastructure Organisation, Environment Agency, Highways England, MHCLG and BEIS.
However, the sector has moved on and since the publication of the GCS there have been a number of commitments to different ways of working between government and the wider construction industry.
These include the commitment to offsite construction from 5 departments, the announcement of the Construction Sector Deal and the publication of the Infrastructure and Projects Authority’s report ‘Transforming Infrastructure Performance’ with the commitment to better alignment of outcomes, smarter infrastructure and improved procurement processes.
This increased level of ambition will require a step change in the government/industry relationship and deliver benefits for all parties involved - most importantly to society, the customers and users of the sector.
[edit] A more productive and sustainable construction industry
To provide an industry view, ICE harnessed the expertise of our members to develop proposals setting out 5 areas of opportunity for government to refine their approach in the following areas:
- Commercial strategy: Using government’s substantial influence effectively and consistently to stimulate a more sustainable and productive construction industry through following the best practice commercial principles set out in Project 13.
- Procurement process: To develop an approach that provides transparency and demonstrates value to the public sector while minimising the burden and costs of bidding for industry.
- Contracting approach: To provide a fair, open and transparent contract which supports the intent of the commercial strategy and the procurement process to successfully deliver the programme outcomes.
- Cross-government risks: Improving the visibility and mitigation of cross-departmental risks such as immigration, skills, and taxation resulting in increased delivery confidence and optimal use of available funding.
- Asset utilisation: Using the new opportunities presented through digital transformation to optimise the design, operation, integration and management of the assets as a system not individual entities.
[edit] Next steps
This submission is the starting point. The door is open for government to collaborate with industry to help shape the development of the GCS and together build a sustainable and productive future for construction and the UK.
ICE hopes to see government use its substantial influence effectively and consistently to help build an environment that fosters better working practices and deliver a step change in the relationship with industry.
This article was originally published by ICE as ‘Let's collaborate to make the future of construction better for all’ on 19 June 2018. It was written by Hannah Vickers.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
What they are, how they work and why they are popular in many countries.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.
Biomass harvested in cycles of less than ten years.
An interview with the new CIAT President
Usman Yaqub BSc (Hons) PCIAT MFPWS.
Cost benefit model report of building safety regime in Wales
Proposed policy option costs for design and construction stage of the new building safety regime in Wales.
Do you receive our free biweekly newsletter?
If not you can sign up to receive it in your mailbox here.

























